tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post173538867470355056..comments2023-10-03T15:45:51.825+01:00Comments on Jailhouselawyer's Blog: David Cameron: A Major disaster?jailhouselawyerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03795278184797990706noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-41920714772444555132011-09-03T18:04:45.616+01:002011-09-03T18:04:45.616+01:00Tim: I am very logical and Cameron's response ...Tim: I am very logical and Cameron's response is not logical. There is no difference except upper and lower class, and the ability to buy one's way out of trouble.<br /><br />This is a PR disaster for DC.jailhouselawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03795278184797990706noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-58599887066081782852011-09-03T14:23:06.943+01:002011-09-03T14:23:06.943+01:00I have to admit, I am struggling to get Mr Cameron...I have to admit, I am struggling to get Mr Cameron's logic here.<br /><br />I don't see much difference between the two situations - both involved a large group of people acting in concert to destroy property. He tries to differentiate between the two by stating:<br /><br />""As I say, we all do stupid things when we're young. And I think that's clear. But I think what we saw in terms of the riots was actually very well organised, in many cases, looting and stealing and thieving.""<br /><br />Well, it can safely be said that many of the rioters were young and doing stupid things, so that leaves the '..actually very well organised..' part. So did the Bullingdon Club not book restaurants under an assumed name and get together in a very well organised way with a view to causing trouble?<br /><br />Maybe I'm simple, but I don't see any material difference.Timhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06323704027686670553noreply@blogger.com