tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post5135898537986238097..comments2023-10-03T15:45:51.825+01:00Comments on Jailhouselawyer's Blog: Law Blog Warjailhouselawyerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03795278184797990706noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-87801767361269131772010-10-24T09:31:31.950+01:002010-10-24T09:31:31.950+01:00"Respect in prison terms is put up or shut up...<i>"Respect in prison terms is put up or shut up."</i><br /><br />Clearly, you can take the man out of the prison, but...<br /><br />;)JuliaMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07844126589712842477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-65945549682394159032010-10-23T22:47:22.722+01:002010-10-23T22:47:22.722+01:00Hahaha ! I think I can probably cope with the qu...Hahaha ! I think I can probably cope with the questions... but I suspect if you do do a podcast you won't need anyone to actually ask the questions....<br /><br />Now.. back in the box and wait and see what the podcast covers! ;-)Charon QChttp://charonqc.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-11905666029948703062010-10-23T22:45:35.057+01:002010-10-23T22:45:35.057+01:00Pam: Because he asked me, and I obliged.
Respect ...Pam: Because he asked me, and I obliged.<br /><br />Respect in prison terms is put up or shut up. The Court excluded public opinion as counting for nought. I agree. This is between the Individaul v the State. Holding them to account. People who read the Sun and Daily Mail and believe the rabid garbage are sad. But, I will ignore their ignorant views.jailhouselawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03795278184797990706noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-58956369317965203022010-10-23T22:37:59.806+01:002010-10-23T22:37:59.806+01:00Charon: I did not say I was not a grumy old man, y...Charon: I did not say I was not a grumy old man, you simply did not think or say it first.<br /><br />Oral hearing is not the same as paper hearing.<br /><br />I will listen. but if it needs an oral response I hope you will accord me the same right as Carl Gardner? He has written a comment on you blog.<br /><br />Don't worry, I will brief you on the right questions to ask me :-)jailhouselawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03795278184797990706noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-80775938023601400062010-10-23T22:25:19.123+01:002010-10-23T22:25:19.123+01:00Given your comment 'I don't need his favou...Given your comment 'I don't need his favours, I made it on my own' I wonder why you accepted his invitation to guest on his blog?<br /><br />Secondly you say, 'People have to earn respect not demand it'. You are ABSOLUTELY right, carry on.Pam Nashhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07371835641538430316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-74480011569922009542010-10-23T22:25:15.817+01:002010-10-23T22:25:15.817+01:00John... this is getting boring....
I don't...John... this is getting boring.... <br /><br />I don't mind a laugh... but life is just too short... fight the government.. not other bloggers... you will have your right of reply to podcast in writing - which, frankly, will get more coverage as people prefer to read than listen.<br /><br />Now stop pissing abart and get on with campaigning and stop fighting the people who actually want to see the UK Govt comply with obligations...<br /><br />And..scalping is so 19th century !<br /><br />And..another thing... you are older than I am.... so you get first choice for Grumpy Old Men... as they say... age before beauty....<br /><br />:-)Charon QChttp://charonqc.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-73178904652685711762010-10-23T22:07:30.021+01:002010-10-23T22:07:30.021+01:00Pam Nash: A formal legal qualification does not ma...Pam Nash: A formal legal qualification does not make him right. If that was the case I would not have won against so many qualified lawyers.<br /><br />I don't need his favours, I made it on my own.<br /><br />People have to earn respect not demand it.jailhouselawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03795278184797990706noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-30588829645830303652010-10-23T21:29:19.771+01:002010-10-23T21:29:19.771+01:00I have just picked this up on twitter and read bot...I have just picked this up on twitter and read both your post on Charon's website, all the comments on it and all the related tweets (it took rather longer than I had anticipated when I started). <br /><br />As an observer not caught up in the melee I am astonished at your aggressive approach to this whole thing and your complete lack of perspective and manners. Courtesy costs nothing and it does not weaken your position. You accuse poor Charon of "willy waving" (classy description that) but your choice of scalping as a metaphor for your legal success seems to me to be precisely that. It is also in extremely poor taste and no doubt deliberately provocative to those who are mindful of your own background. <br /><br />I don't really want to wade into this bunfight but your post on your own blog goes way beyond arguing your case and simply launches into an attack on Charon - with rather unappealing relish. I think you need to reflect on how you come across to other people and ask yourself whether you are doing yourself or your campaign any favours? <br /><br />Incidentally I agree that prisoners should have the vote. There are many criminal and objectionable people outside prison but I accept their right to vote regardless of those characteristics.Lucy Reedhttp://pinktape.co.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-41555473744373845202010-10-23T20:59:58.115+01:002010-10-23T20:59:58.115+01:00Charon is a kind, helpful man - I speak from perso...Charon is a kind, helpful man - I speak from personal experience. As far as his podcast is concerned, he can invite who he wants to participate - or not; you have no inalienable right to muscle into whatever takes your eye. He has, clearly, got under your skin or you wouldn't have written this post. John, a bit of well meant advice, take it or not - just because people disagree with you it doesn't make them bad people, it merely means they have a diferring point of view. It also doesn't make them automatically wrong. Charon extended a courtesy to you, which you then abused him for - I suspect you believed, when you accepted his invitation, that you could pontificate without challenge; but that isn't the nature of his blog. <br /><br />You are not always right - neither am I, but I accept that as a concept. The sooner you do, the sooner you will gain some respect.Pam Nashhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07371835641538430316noreply@blogger.com