tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post4186994218224661217..comments2023-10-03T15:45:51.825+01:00Comments on Jailhouselawyer's Blog: Wire mejailhouselawyerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03795278184797990706noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20662517.post-52799474062514405752009-08-30T17:20:17.038+01:002009-08-30T17:20:17.038+01:00Hi,
Your post is pretty silly, i'm afraid, an...Hi,<br /><br />Your post is pretty silly, i'm afraid, and a moments reflection will show you why.<br /><br />My article for Liberal Conspiracy referred to a UK politician citing the wire (he did so on UK TV, and it was much documented), and pointed out - using knowledge of the wire - that his rhetoric was wholly misplaced. <br /><br />My piece had NOTHING to do with churnalism. Nor did it have anything to do with the hoax letter (it was written and published before the letter you refer to came to public awareness).<br /><br />Could you explain to me why I have failed to undertake research, as you are implying? <br /><br />You know, it might really have helped if you had bothered to read my article. Or The Wire. Neither of which - as you say in your own post! - you have bothered to read or view.<br /><br />I must say, of all the attempts to smear me online, this is by far the most inept. Your blog carries a remark about people who reply with though process and those with knee jerks...a little self reflection seems in order, don't you think?<br /><br />And for the record, I no longer work for John Pugh, as i'm returning to University to do a Masters degree (that post went up on my last day of employment).<br /><br />Thanks for the link though...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com