Friday, May 25, 2007

Control Freak John Reid



From The Independent: Reid threatens to suspend human rights laws after terror suspects go missing
By Nigel Morris, Home Affairs Correspondent
Published: 25 May 2007

John Reid faced growing anger as he signalled the Government was ready to declare that Britain faced an "emergency" over terrorism and opt out of human rights legislation.

As the recriminations flew over the disappearance of three radical Islamists who had been on control orders, he made clear his determination to bring in tougher curbs on terror suspects. The Home Secretary said that could mean "derogating" from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) so he could impose tougher control orders on suspects.

The convention, which entered British law via the Human Rights Act, allows countries to suspend parts of the ECHR in "time of emergency".

Control orders, which restrict movements and contact with other people for terror suspects who cannot be brought to court, were introduced two years ago. They replaced the detention without trial of the "Belmarsh detainees," which was ruled illegal.

The latest disappearances bring to six the number of people on control orders who have vanished in the past year and have left the control-order system in disarray. A major police search was under way last night for Lamine Adam, 26, his brother Ibrahim, 20, and Cerie Bullivant, 24, after they went missing this week. Police believe they may try to travel to Iraq or Afghanistan.

A third Adams brother, Anthony Garcia, 25, was jailed for life last month for his part in the "fertiliser bomb" plot to attack targets including a shopping mall and a London nightclub.

Bullivant is due to stand trial over claims he breached his control order on 13 occasions over the past 10 months. All three had been assessed at the lower end of risk, but the fact that they co-ordinated their disappearances has alarmed the police.

Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police commissioner, said: "Nobody can be perfectly satisfied they are not a risk to the public here, but the intelligence is pointing in another direction."

However, Mr Reid had said the men were "not considered at this time to represent a direct threat to the public in the UK".

News of the absconders triggered fiery clashes over the control-order system in the Commons. The Home Secretary admitted that he would prefer to detain terror suspects or deport those who are foreign nationals, but said he was constrained by legal and political opposition to that approach.

He said he wanted to impose tougher control-order regimes, but was hampered from doing so by court judgments under the ECHR. Mr Reid said he wanted the convention modernised by European leaders to reflect the realities of the terrorist threat. But he added: "We will consider other options, which include derogation, if we have exhausted ways of overturning previous judgments on this issue."

Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, said: "By threatening to derogate from the European Convention on Human Rights, John Reid reveals a worrying mix of sloppy thinking and buck-passing." He said it was "wildly inaccurate to claim that the three escapees were somehow helped by our respect for human rights".

David Davis, the shadow Home Secretary, said the escapes were caused by the Government failing to use existing powers, such as tagging suspects. He also said the delay in releasing the identities of the fugitives had allowed them to flee abroad.

"He is now blaming his own Human Rights Act when he has not even tried to derogate under its provisions. He can blame the courts and the opposition, but the problems are of his own making," Mr Davis said.

Shami Chakrabarti, the director of the campaign group Liberty, said: "This is last year's rhetoric from yesterday's Home Secretary".

From The Guardian.

From the Telegraph.

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous6:28 PM

    Lets face it - human rights are going to dissapear in a puff of smoke very soon in this country due to the impending military secure state. Letting in all the scurf in from any other country in the world willy-nilly gives the government a good opportunity for any one of them to commit crimes which "need" to be clamped down on. The government create the problem and then devise ways to clamp down on the problem. This is just an excuse to bring in draconian control laws. You've already seen the loss of your smoking in public places, the clampdown on the unlicenced production of Buzz Lightyear models and now our cat has to wear a tracking device up its jacksy to let the local council pariahs know who's garden it is shitting on.

    As I said before, this is all a weak excuse to reign controls over the populace. Do you know that it has recently become illegal to put cow dung through your neighbour's letterbox? I used to regard this as one of my constitutional rights along with tarring and feathering the postman.

    Britain is going to hell in a shopping cart.

    ReplyDelete