Has Clarence Mitchell spun out of control?
Following the judgment, released by the Evora Supreme Court of Justice in Portimao, the Daily Mirror asked the McCanns' spokesman Clarence Mitchell for a comment and he said: "They are not officially suspected of any crime. Nor have they been accused of any crime".
However, if we remove the spin by Clarence Mitchell a different picture emerges:
"This is the first judiciary dispatch that is not covered by the judicial secrecy, that assumes that the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann contains the suspicions of crimes of homicide, exposure, abandonment and concealment of a cadaver.
Those were the criminal indices that were imputed to Gerry and Kate and over which they were made arguidos" (reported in Correio da Manhã, translated by Astro, and source the mccannfiles).
So, the McCanns are officially suspected of several crimes, and they have been accused of several crimes.
Perhaps, Clarence Mitchell meant that the McCanns have not been arrested and charged as yet?
n.b. First posted on the 3As forum. The photoshop comes from a poster on the 3As.
We know that you read this. You really ought to back to Portugal and face the music. But you won't. Because you are venal cowards.
ReplyDeleteJohn, I am sure you are more than well aware than most, that the police are a very devious bunch.
ReplyDeleteWhy haven't the UK police stepped in to put pressure on the McCann's if there is any grounded suspicion that they were involved in Madeleine’s disappearance?
As I understand it, presently Portugal has jurisdiction in this case.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I have been led to understand that behind the scenes Leicestershire police have been carrying out their own investigation of the McCanns.
It may be if the Portuguese cannot pin them down, jurisdiction may be transferred to us.
Personally, I don't think there is any escape.
Hi
ReplyDeleteI have never posted on your blog before but I read & enjoy it.
I do not have much knowledge about financial matters but as the McCann Fund is over 1 year old should there not have been some kind of audit or tax returns filed by now giving details ofincome & outgoings?