Why Sarah Payne's mother should shut the fuck up
Sarah's Law will spread suspicion and hurt among friends and neighbours, and children will suffer
"Only a few days ago, it was reported that adults who went for a walk in their local park were being cross-examined by park officials as to their motives - they were not accompanied by any children, so they must, according to the warped philosophy of our times, be suspected of being there for a more sinister reason".
UPDATE: Sarah's Law absurdities
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
John,
ReplyDeleteThe Home Office, not Sarah's mother is responsible for the lunacy.
The mother tried and failed years ago to instigate legislation allowing parents access to registers of sex offenders. Sarah's Law, as it was known, failed for good reasons ON POLICE ADVICE - VIGILANTE REPRISALS/FORCING SEXUAL OFFENDERS UNDERGROUND AWAY FROM MONITORS.
THE HOME OFFICE HAS USED THE NAME SARAH'S LAW FOR TOTALLY THE WRONG PURPOSE AND REASON. I SUSPECT SARAH'S MOTHER WAS FOOLED IN THE PROCESS.
jailhouselawyer,
ReplyDeleteWhat the f ... k is the Home Office playing at ??
It's been around 10 years since Sarah fell victim to a paedophile, the last reported case in Britain.
Why the sudden urge to take totally the wrong action against police advice and advise of those monitoring known sex offenders ??
Is it linked to the McCanns love of the word paedophile ? Likely, the Home Office backed them AGAINST the police. Why upset the very effective system in place ?
Media manipulation .....
ReplyDeleteWTF. I must admit I thought the bit about the park was a piss-take till I just googled the story and read the Mail article.
ReplyDeletePaedohysteria reaches new heights. Is it legal? Is a park not public property? Are the paths not rights of way? Can one not just tell the miserable parkie to fuck off?
Surely, in theory, the law does not require me to explain myself to anyone unless it can be demonstrated that I am doing something wrong. Or maybe I have been away too long.
richard,
ReplyDeleteIt's harrassment, menace and invasion of privacy. The Home Office seems hell bent on the public, including children, replacing the police, their law abiding methods and duties !
The Law does not permit the police to cause menace or harrassment to innocent people going about their business. They heartily discourage the public taking the law into their own hands.
Labour's making it as impossible for the police to work effectively as it has in other sectors - NHS and teaching. It could run a
p .... s up in a brewery.
richard,
ReplyDeleteSarah's Law like Sharia Law is, I'm told legally, invalid. Both bypassed Parliamentary legisative procedures.
So, you are within your rights to tell an 'out of order' nosey Park Warden to go jack himself up. Who is monitoring him monitoring you ?? !!!
The joke is that in yesterday's press a 'researcher' urged 5 year olds to be taught the pleasures of gay sex - can you believe ??? !!!
Hope this pervert is being well monitored; he's clearly targetting vulnerable children into the delights (as he finds it) of buggery.
anon 2.54: You could well be right.
ReplyDeleteanon 3.02: When it comes to protecting children the McCanns get me thinking of Brady and Hindley...
Richard: I have had a similar experience, the police asking me 5 days in a row what I am doing in my local park. I was livid at the harassment. It's creating a culture of suspicion. Nobody is innocent unless they can prove it. And even then, according to the authorities, everybody is a potential risk. It's a game we can't win unless we change the rules and the thinking.
John,
ReplyDeleteBrady & Hindley .. same disregard.
McCanns and behaviour surrounding them is vile and sinister in the extreme.
I believe Payne was targetted because he 'broke ranks' and by the worst insinuation possible - mccannfiles last November - report by one Tapas member's lawyer.
I also believe you and Rocky were 'targetted'.
Brady & Hindley alone enacted their evil .... the evil in Madeleine's case involves a Mafioso mentality network.
jailhouselawyer,
ReplyDeleteWTF ... the police have no authority to question you taking your habitual stroll in the park.
jailhouselawyer,
ReplyDeleteHave I missed something ? Has Britain banned democracy and it's laws and become a police state ??
What, I wonder, would a judge make of police questioning people out for a normal, innocent stroll ? Is the crime rate so low in Hull that they have nothing better to do than harrass the innocent ?
jailhouselawyer,
ReplyDeleteThe police are legally bound to prove their suspicions in Court and on any grounds.
Friends in the police (in the south) say your experiences are bang out of order, highly questionable and grounds for formal complaint. Rogue coppers ?
Perhaps your blogs get up Big Brother's nostrils.
ReplyDeleteOne of the most nauseating aspects of Mitchell's media campaign was a photo of Kate wearing (as always) virginal white. Alongside 'Saint' Kate was a photo of a gaunt dishevelled handcuffed woman reportedly charged with child neglect/wasting police time - Shannon's mother. The family were 'inspired' by the McCanns - confessed they hoped also to obtain £1 m (under false pretences).
ReplyDeleteThis is the third threat I have received from this particular person. I'm obviously getting up somebody's nose. I don't take kindly to threats. I may even report this one to the relevant authorities...
ReplyDelete"doves has made a comment on Citizen correspondent report 2:
jailhouselawyer watch you're back i know the places you go.
You can reply to this comment by visiting the comments page.
© 2008 YouTube".
Sad old bastard...
ReplyDelete"doves
Joined: November 16, 2005
Last Sign In: 12 hours ago
Videos Watched: 8,742
Subscribers: 0
Channel Views: 257
Name: barry
Age: 70".
John,
ReplyDeleteAnn Widdecombe writes - "I was sufficiently uneasy about Sarah's Law when I met the Paynes 8 years ago as Shadow Home Secrety, not to give them my whole hearted backing but instead to agree to look at possible legal changes.
I was worried about vigilantes but now I am even more worried that WHOLLY INNOCENT people will, as a result of MALICIOUS or mistaken allegations, be branded with one of the worst offences imaginable".
No Parliamentary or legal changes have been made to systems of monitoring sex offenders, making "Sarah's Law" non existent, invalid as far as Courts are concerned.
You are within your legal rights not to answer any questions posed by Brown's Gestapo style 'watchers' whilst taking your usual innocent walk in the park.
They have no legal right to invade your privacy or cause you harrassment; nor any other innocent citizen.
"Sarah's Law" is no more than a figment of Home Office's imagination.
jailhouselawyer,
ReplyDeleteThreats and bullying is par for the course with bloggers like you.
As you say, sad old git !
Strange you mentioned Brady & Hindley because Ann Widdicombe did as well.
ReplyDeleteEven if Sarah's Law had been passed, which it wasn't for very good reasons, it would not have prevented the likes of Brady & Hindley's evil treatment of children.
Nor would it have prevented or safeguarded the 92% of children
who die at the hands of parents/care givers.
Stand by for another rise in crime rates if the police become pre-occupied dealing with malicious, trouble making accusers of the innocents.
ReplyDeleteIt's like watching a country being run by a lunatic asylum.
And so, tired of persecuting the McCanns, you move onto another victim.
ReplyDelete@thread commenters (sockpuppets?), can you be any more obsequious?
anonymous,
ReplyDeleteGet your facts right before accusing innocents of 'persecution'.
Mr Amaral's conclusions, along with countless others, were based on overwhelming evidence of death and disposal.
Conversely, no evidence exists to support the government protected McCanns. Kate's were the only print found on the window ....
It's a 'first' that two democracies should suffer 'mafioso rule' in the process.
John believes the police evidence over and above McCanns' lack. Do you have a problem with this ?
anonymous,
ReplyDeleteAlarming that (evidenced conclusions) of death and disposal of an innocent British child has led to anarchy by McCann protectionists.
anonymous,
ReplyDeleteGet your facts right before accusing innocents of 'persecution'.
No one is accusing 'innocents' of persecution.
Why not write without swearing.
ReplyDelete