Kate and Gerry McCann v Gonçalo Amaral
The money grabbing McCanns are at it again. According to the Daily Mirror, the McCanns claim that they are, in relation to Gonçalo Amaral, so TORN APART BY HIS LIES that they have issued a writ for defamation and breach of their human rights and claim £1M in damages and the case is to be heard in Lisbon next Summer.
Apparently, the McCanns claim that Gonçalo Amaral's accusations that they are responsible for Madeleine's death and then covering it up has left them distraught. The writ claims that both the McCanns suffer from "permanent anxiety, insomnia, lack of appetite, irritability and an indefinable fear". It also claims that Kate McCann is "steeped in a deep and serious depression".
According to the biased Daily Mirror report, it is said that Gonçalo Amaral's theory is absurd that Madeleine died in Apartment 5A and that the McCanns covered it up. However, I find his theory far from absurd. What I find absurd are the McCanns explanations and their belief that everybody should believe their lies.
The writ accuses Amaral of being a self-obsessed, manipulative money-grabber with no morals. Isn't this just a case of the McCanns pot calling kettle black?
Strangely, "Madeleine is named with Kate and Gerry and the twins as a complainant in the lawsuit". I don't know about Portuguese law, but under English law a dead person is unable to be defamed therefore cannot bring a claim. As for the McCanns claiming that the twins have been defamed and that their human rights are being breached is absurd!
According to the McCanns writ, "Madeleine has been deprived of the possibility of a fair and adequate investigation into her disappearance, putting her moral and physical integrity at serious risk". Given that the McCanns from the outset interfered with the official investigation, this claim is a bit rich coming from them. Can somebody please tell me how it is possible to put the moral and physical integrity of a 3 year old dead child at serious risk?
The writ goes on to claim that the McCanns have been "totally destroyed from a moral, social, ethical, emotional and family point of view, beyond the pain that the absence of their eldest daughter causes them". What is moral and ethical about leaving 3 children under 4 unsupervised and then lying about a fake break-in?
The McCanns claim Amaral's "sole objectives" in writing the book were "to earn a lot of money", using "lies". Again this is a bit rich coming from the McCanns who's sole purpose of setting up the Find Madeleine Fund was to earn a lot of money by telling lies.
UPDATE: Link
Related content:
Mother who left children playing in park is branded a criminal
A Sunday school teacher was given a police record after she briefly left her own children playing together in a park while she popped to a nearby shop. Why is it only the McCanns who have escaped being brought to justice?
Hat-Tip mccannfiles
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
They are sickening scumbags who only care about money, money and nothing but the money.
ReplyDeleteWhy issue a writ to a newspaper and not to lawyers?
Why didn't they issue the writ before the book was published. Why wait until it's made profit?
These people are seriously taking the piss and I can't wait for their comeuppance.
They are miserable, sick, morally bankrupt f*ckers who belong behind bars.
If they're so depressed then those twins need to be taken into care before those pricks lose another child.
Who the hell cares if they're depressed? And how come they've waited 2 years after Madeleine disappeared to announce it? The death of their daughter didn't make them depressed but a book has?
Ah, but it's not any old book is it? It's a book of the Truth. That's a word they don't know the meaning of.
Strewth, give me strength.
This sickening charade must end soon.
ReplyDeleteThe McCanns must learn the hard way that THEY were responsible for Maddie's fate when they decided it was a good idea to go out on the piss with their mates leaving three kids under the age of four alone in an unlocked apertment.
Accidents with toddlers take seconds. They have no concept of mortal danger.
How can they blame anyone but themselves for 'the situation Madeleine finds herself in' to quote the distraught father.
I'd be feeling pretty shit if I wre them.
Don't blame Amaral. He was only doing his job. And doing it a little too well for the McCann's liking methinks.
http://store.findmadeleine.com/
ReplyDeleteMadeleine is only worth the aged photo on a piece of paper, too much money to change the vest.
Maddie no longer looks 3 years old unless they are set up by the mccanns and their mafia there will be no more sightings. This latest aged shot is only what maddie MAY look like.
Anyone notice how the mccanns have stopped looking for her and are now contentrating on the phantom "abductor".
IRONSIDE
http://easttimorlegal.blogspot.com/2009/03/journalists-denounce-draft-media-laws.html
ReplyDeletexxxxxxx
Isabel Duarte not much help here then....
IRONSIDE
Ironside @ 6.03: Very interesting. I will look at it again. I don't think from what I have read it helps the McCanns case. History repeating itself. Isabel Duarte is the Metodo 3 of the legal profession!
ReplyDeletehttp://rungerryrun.weebly.com/
ReplyDeleteIRONSIDE
Elizabeth Smart- Runaway or Kidnapped?
ReplyDeleteElizabeth Smart disappeared June 5, 2002 from her Federal Heights home in the middle of the night. That is the only known truth of the entire ordeal. The story plays like a “Movie of the Week” seen on Lifetime Network, so it is no surprise that the family has hired an entertainment lawyer, a book has been published, people have been fired, a man’s reputation was destroyed as he went to his grave, and brainwashing is involved. Let’s not forget the reward money and the political aspirations of her father, Ed Smart.
It is sad that a little girl was taken from her “safe” home and the parents call their religious leader before calling the police. It is sad that a little girl disappeared from her “safe” home and her sister can’t remember if the guy had a knife or a gun. It is sad that a little girl is gone from her “safe” home and the public doubts that it was really a kidnapping. What does this say about the Nation as a whole, that we would question whether a little girl was kidnapped or not.
What is pathetic is that the family released pictures of Elizabeth at age 9; she was 14 when she disappeared. Her sister waits 2-3 hours before telling her parents that she has gone.
Sound Familiar
IRONSIDE...
Why did Smart release pictures of a much younger child?????
Why did Mccann?????
IRONSIDE