Do you think it could have something to do with the lies that the McCanns told and that that is good enough reason not to believe her?
For example...
I hope Kate McCann is asked to explain why the McCanns put out the false story that the shutters had been jemmied and Apartment 5 A was the subject of a break-in?
This was the McCann theory fed to the British press. And they lapped it up. Break-in + abductor = abduction. The Mark Warner complex stated that there was no break-in. Then the police said that there was no evidence of a break-in. It was not until October, almost 6 months later, before Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns press spokesman admitted that there was no break-in.
The British media did not ask for an explanation why the McCanns fabricated the break-in story. Shouldn't the British media at least consider it was a cover up? Because without the break-in the abductor and abduction parts also tend to fall down.
And yet, Cassandra Jardine writes "the McCanns learnt after the abduction" as though it is a fact that Madeleine was abducted. But, the fact is that it was only ever the McCanns version of events and not the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment