Site Meter

Friday, June 15, 2007

European agency details alleged secret prison activity


European agency details alleged secret prison activity

A report says Polish and Romanian officials helped the U.S. with the CIA interrogation facilities for 'high-value' terrorism detainees.

From the Los Angeles Times

By Sebastian Rotella
Times Staff Writer June 9, 2007

PARIS — The CIA held suspected Al Qaeda militants in secret prisons in Poland and Romania, enlisting top officials in those countries to create and conceal the facilities, a European intergovernmental agency alleged Friday.

Current and former intelligence officials in Europe and the United States told the Council of Europe that the interrogation facilities were hubs of a global anti-terrorism campaign that used torture, clandestine flights and extrajudicial abductions known as extraordinary rendition, according to a report by the council, based in Strasbourg, France.

Although many of the allegations had already been made by human rights groups, former prisoners and the media, the report provided new details about how Washington's Polish and Romanian allies allegedly set up heavily fortified, top-secret outposts where U.S. agents reportedly subjected "high-value" prisoners to abusive interrogations between 2003 and 2005.

"Poland and Romania agreed to provide the premises in which these facilities were established, the highest degrees of physical security and secrecy, and steadfast guarantees of noninterference," said Dick Marty, a Swiss senator leading the inquiry. "We have spoken about the high-value detainee program with multiple well-placed sources in the governments and intelligence services of several countries, including the United States, Poland and Romania."

In response, U.S. and European officials issued denials and questioned the senator's objectivity. "When you see words like 'apartheid' and 'torture' in the document, that tells you it's biased and distorted," CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano said.

Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the White House National Security Council, said he had not seen the report and that the White House would have no comment on it.

President Bush, whose only public comments Friday were during a brief visit to Poland before he flew to Rome, made no reference to the report.

The Council of Europe, a 47-state agency that promotes human rights and democracy, is a separate, less prominent entity than the European Union and does not have governmental investigative powers.

Marty acknowledged gaps in his conclusions, noting that he had not identified the location of the alleged CIA site in Romania. Although he cited CIA sources in alleging that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, was interrogated at the Polish site, he made the assertion based on analysis of data about apparent CIA flights to Poland shortly after Mohammed's capture.

Marty accused airport directors, spy chiefs and the presidents of Poland and Romania of "a whole series of illegal acts" related to the secret prisons.

In September, Bush acknowledged the existence of foreign interrogation sites without naming the locations.

He said the methods used in the interrogations were "safe, lawful and necessary" and had obtained "vital information necessary to do our jobs, and that's to protect the American people and our allies."

U.S. allies in Europe have been critical of renditions and other hard-nosed, extrajudicial tactics such as the detention and military trials of terrorism suspects at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. But some European anti-terrorism officials say privately that sometimes brutal measures by U.S. agencies have helped prevent Al Qaeda strikes on the scale of the Sept. 11 attacks.

The CIA chose Poland and Romania for the unprecedented, politically explosive operations because they are staunch and eager U.S. allies, the report asserted.

Washington formed "special partnerships with countries that were economically vulnerable, emerging from difficult transitional periods in their history, and dependent on American support for their strategic development," the report said. It cited a "long-serving CIA officer" saying: "We have an extraordinary relationship with Poland."

In 2002, the CIA won the approval of Poland's then-president, Aleksander Kwasniewski, the report alleged. American intelligence officers worked exclusively with Polish military intelligence to avoid civilian oversight, the report said. It alleged that CIA planes using "dummy flight plans" began arriving in early 2003 at the Szczytno-Szymany airport in northeastern Poland, carrying prisoners considered to be leading Al Qaeda figures.

Though Polish security forces provided an outer ring of protection, only Americans handled the prisoners, the report said. U.S. agents in vans took them to the secret facility at Stare Kiejkuty, an intelligence training base, the report said.

"Polish officials were not involved in the interrogations or transfers of [detainees], nor did they have contact," Marty said.

Following a similar pattern, after gaining clearance from Romania's then-president, Ion Iliescu, and assistance from his military intelligence service, the CIA opened a second interrogation site in Romania as the clandestine detention program expanded in late 2003 and 2004, the report alleged.

"Several of our Romanian sources commented that they felt proud to have been able to assist the United States in detaining 'high value' terrorists — not only as a gesture of pro-American sentiment, but also because they thought it was in the best interest of Romania," the report said.

Both secret prisons were allegedly dismantled by late 2005 and the prisoners transferred elsewhere, according to Marty.

rotella@latimes.com

Times staff writers James Gerstenzang in Rome and Greg Miller in Washington contributed to this report.

Outsourcing Torture here.

Paris Hilton inadvertently becomes a prison reformer


Paris Hilton has inadvertently become a prison reformer. The prison authorities, rather than treat Paris Hilton the same as they treat other prisoners have decided to treat other prisoners as well as they treat Paris Hilton. I think that the same would happen over here if the likes of Jeffery Archer and Jonathan Aitken had not been given special privileges then the prison authorities would have had to raise the standard of living of the general prison population. The idea behind this is that the prison authorities don't like the public knowing how bad the conditions really are. They prefer them to think that prisoners are living in hotel conditions. I would advocate that more celebrities are subjected to prison as this would force through genuine prison reforms.

Nicky Hilton is forgetting that Paris Hilton was done for DUI in the first place and that is why her driving licence was suspended.

As for the District Attorney's wife getting a more lenient sentence, it was her first time whereas Paris Hilton is a repeat offender. I think the more pertinent question is, surely the DA was aware that his wife was driving whilst under a suspension?

International Centre for Comparative Criminological Research

Next week I am attending the ICCCR Conference and will be giving a talk.

‘THE PROGRESSIVE PRISON? HISTORICAL NARRATIVES, CONTEMPORARY REALTIES’

ICCCR Conference, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes

Thursday 21 June & Friday 22 June 2007

and

Launch of Handbook on Prisons (Willan Publishing)



Thursday June 21



09:15-09:45
Registration
Tea and Coffee



09:45-10:00
Welcome and Introduction

Yvonne Jewkes
(Open University)



10:00-11:00
Two Keynote Addresses

Alison Liebling (Cambridge University) ‘Transitions and continuities in prison life: 1987-2007’; and
Richard Sparks (Edinburgh University) ‘Incarceration, legitimacy and their limits’

Chair Yvonne Jewkes (Open University)



11:00-12:45
Expert Panel ‘The most pressing issue facing the prison system is…’ I Phil Wheatley (Director General Prison Service), Michael Wheatley (Senior Manager, Directorate of High Security, HM Prison Service),

Jamie Bennett (Prison Manager), Mark Leech (Editor The Prisons Handbook), Chloe Chitty (Home Office RDS), Diana Medlicott (Buckingham Chilterns University)

Chair Reece Walters (Open University)



12:45-13:30
Lunch



13:30-15:00


Roundtable Discussion ‘Capturing Public Opinion: Prisons, Media and the Public’ Paul Mason (Cardiff University), Lucie Russell (SmartJustice), Richard Garside (Kings College London),
John Hirst (prison law consultant and campaigner for penal reform), Maik Finch (ex-prisoner and OU Criminology student)

Chair Paul Mason (Cardiff University)



15:00-15:15
Tea and Coffee



15:15-17:00


Expert Panel ‘Solutions to the prison crisis’ Lucie Russell (SmartJustice), John Pratt (Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand), Joe Sim (John Moores University Liverpool), Kimmett Edgar (Prison Reform Trust)

Chair John Muncie (Open University)



17:15-18:45


Pub Quiz and Bar

19:00
Conference Dinner







The ICCCR

International Centre for
Comparative Criminological Research






Friday June 22



09:00-09:15
Tea and Coffee



09:15-10:45
‘Learning from the past… looking to the future’’

Simon Devereaux (University of Victoria, Canada), Heather Shore (Leeds Metropolitan University), Helen Johnston (Hull University), Saul Hewish (RideOut/Creative Prison)

Chair Chris Williams (Open University)



10:45-11:30
‘Is the future private?’

Mick Ryan (Greenwich University),

Trevor Williams (NOMS)

Chair Deb Drake (Open University)



11:30-12:45
Expert Panel ‘The most pressing issue facing the prison system is…’II Elaine Crawley (Salford University), Leonie Howe (Greenwich University), Alice Mills (Southampton University), Dirk van Zyl Smit (Nottingham Trent University) Deborah Coles (Inquest)

Chair TBC



12:45-13:30
Lunch



13:30-13:45


Wine Reception/Launch



13:45-15:00
3 Papers from Handbook Contributors:

Laura Piacentini (Strathclyde University) ‘Bringing Russian Prisons to Life and the Entangled Self: Reflections on the Method and the Madness of Prison Research in Russia’

Ben Crewe (Cambridge University) ‘The New Society of Captives: Learning from the Classic Studies, and Moving On’

David Scott (Central Lancashire University) ‘Understanding the changing face of prisons: legitimacy deficit or crises of penal legitimacy?’

Chair Yvonne Jewkes (Open University)



15:00-15:30


Closing Address

Pat Carlen ‘Imaginary Penalities, Risk-Crazed Governance and the Politics of Prison Research’

Chair Clive Emsley (Open University)



15:30


Tea and Coffee



16:00
FINISH









The ICCCR

International Centre for
Comparative Criminological Research

America prepares for 'cyber war' with China


America prepares for 'cyber war' with China

By Alex Spillius in Washington
Last Updated: 2:42am BST 15/06/2007

China is striving to overtake the United States as the dominant power in cyberspace, according to a senior American general, in what is emerging as a new theatre of conflict between nation states and a growing priority for the Pentagon.

The Chinese foreign ministry rejected the Pentagon report as 'brutal interference'.

Lt Gen Robert Elder, commander of the 8th Air Force, said that all of America's foes, including Iran, were looking at ways of hacking into US networks to glean trade and defence secrets.

But efforts by China set it apart. "They're the only nation that has been quite that blatant about saying 'we're looking to do that'," said Gen Elder in Washington.

Gen Elder is to head a new cyber command centre being set up at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, already home to about 25,000 military personnel involved in everything from electronic warfare to network defence.

The command's focus is to control the "cyber domain", which the Pentagon now sees as critical to everything from communications to surveillance to infrastructure security, and just as important as "kinetic war".

His remarks follow last month's annual report by the Pentagon on China's military power which said China regarded computer network operations as critical to achieving "electromagnetic dominance" early in a conflict.

China's People's Liberation Army had established units to develop viruses to attack enemy computer systems and networks, the Pentagon said.

China also was investing in electronic countermeasures and defences against electronic attack, including infrared decoys and false-target generators.

The US military now defines cyberspace as much broader than merely defending or attacking computer networks.

Michael Wynne, the air force secretary, recently described the dangers as including remotely detonated roadside bombs in Iraq as well as interference with global positioning satellites and financial transactions over the internet.

He said America's nerve centre "resides in cyberspace. Our military command and control, and precision strike capability all rely on ensured access to the electronic spectrum."

Caitlin Harrington, an aviation specialist at Jane's Defence Weekly, said: "The US military is taking this very seriously. It is similar to the once-emerging question of dominance of outer space."

Gen Elder said a cyber war would probably involve precision targeting of enemy military networks, command centres or air defence systems.

The clearest example so far of cyber conflict came earlier this year when Estonia claimed that state-sponsored Russian hackers had attacked official websites in retaliation for the removal of a Soviet-era monument in its capital, Tallinn.

Government email and private online banking had to be shut down temporarily, while telecommunications companies and news organisations were also affected.

Nato allies and European specialists found that some of the attacks originated from IP (internet protocol) addresses that appeared to belong to the administration of Russian president Vladimir Putin.

The Chinese foreign ministry rejected the Pentagon's report as "brutal interference" in internal affairs and insisted that Beijing's military preparations were purely defensive.

Friday competition

No prizes for guessing which gull is the noisy female...



Hat-Tip to maneatingcheesesandwich for this one.

Welsh MP wins libel case

Welsh MP wins libel case

Jun 15 2007

Western Mail

LABOUR MP Martyn Jones yesterday won £5,000 libel damages over a claim that he subjected a young Westminster security guard to a foul-mouthed outburst when asked for his pass.

Mr Jones, who has held Clwyd South for 20 years, bowed his head over his clasped hands as a High Court jury returned its majority verdict after nearly a day of deliberation.

He had told the jurors he felt “anger and disgust” when he saw the claim in the Mail on Sunday that he had twice told Chris Ham to “f*** off” and was shouting and swearing at the top of his voice.

Last night Mr Jones said, “I am absolutely delighted because this case was not about money – it was about clearing my name.

“I am not the kind of person described in the Mail on Sunday’s article.

“It has been a terrible four days but worth every minute because my constituents now know for sure that I did not do what was said in the article.”

He added, “This article was a political attack against me as a Labour MP by a right-wing newspaper. It is as simple as that.

“Today, however, the nasty, vindictive political games of the Mail on Sunday have been rumbled.

“They deliberately exaggerated the incident in a crude attempt to ruin my integrity. They have failed in doing so.

“I have always denied the allegations made by the Mail on Sunday and today justice has been done.

“I did not take this to court to gain financial damages. I took this case to court to expose the lies that the Mail on Sunday told about me, and to reveal the extent to which they will go to attack a Labour MP.”

The newspaper will have to pay the costs of the action, which are unofficially estimated at up to £300,000.

Mr Jones’s QC, Ronald Thwaites, said the newspaper had blown up a “trivial” exchange between the 60-year-old MP and Mr Ham into a “full-scale international incident”.

He told Mr Justice Eady that the May 2006 article was a “grotesque distortion of the truth”.

Mr Jones said that when Mr Ham asked for the pass, he only said, “I don’t give a s*** what you are. You should know who Members of Parliament are,” before showing his pass.

He regretted swearing and apologised later but, like many MPs, he feared passes could be copied if they were seen and that it was better for security to identify MPs by their faces.

Mr Ham, 21, said he had never seen Mr Jones until he “politely” asked for his pass on a day when there was heightened security because of Prime Minister’s Questions.

He was left “shocked and flustered” by his response.

“His immediate response was to tell me to f*** off and that he was a Member of Parliament.

“I again asked politely, persisted. His second response was ‘F*** off, you should know who I am, you don’t have the right to question me, you are only security’.”

He said Mr Jones’s tone became more aggressive although he “reluctantly” produced his pass at the third request.

“I wouldn’t say he was shouting but he was sort of dismissing me, waving his arm at me.”

Mr Ham, a Metropolitan Police security officer working at Westminster, was giving evidence for Associated Newspapers, which denied libel and said its story was substantially true.

Its QC, Bernard Livesey, said that, for all Mr Ham knew, “Mr Jones could have been a terrorist wearing a suit or just someone wandering around trying to get information he shouldn’t have access to”. Even on Mr Jones’s account of events, the MP had verbally abused Mr Ham.

Mr Thwaites had said that the article, “Labour MP in foul-mouthed outburst at police guard”, contained a dozen untruths and was a vindictive attack on a hard-working conscientious career politician.

Mr Jones was also claiming damages over an item in the newspaper’s Black Dog column a week later, which called him “ludicrous” and claimed his excuse for not wearing his pass was that if al-Qaeda got in, they would have been able to identify him.

Hat-Tip to Iain Dale's Diary.

Prisoners paid £2.5m compensation

Prisoners paid £2.5m compensation

The Prison Service paid £2.5m in compensation to prisoners in England and Wales last year, figures show.

Details about the payments, which do not include legal costs, were released under the Freedom of Information Act.

Two jails, Wormwood Scrubs, in London, and Northallerton Young Offenders Institution, in North Yorkshire, were responsible for almost half the total.

Prisoners in 94 jails were compensated over claims of abuse, assault, unlawful detention and medical negligence.

Treatments withdrawn

The figures revealed the biggest single out-of-court payment was for £575,000 which was made to a young, male prisoner in Northallerton Young Offenders Institution who had apparently attempted suicide.

Wormwood Scrubs settled one claim for £472,000.

It has not been revealed why these two payments were made, but they were included in a category of injury claims for official misconduct and human rights' breaches.

The figures also showed £750,000 was paid to 197 heroin addicts whose treatment was withdrawn or cut short while they were in prison.

The damages paid to the heroin addicts were approved by a High Court judge last November, following their claims that the practice amounted to an assault and breach of human rights.

No more war war

Cadbury admits salmonella charges


Cadbury admits salmonella charges


Press Association
Friday June 15, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

Confectionery giant Cadbury today pleaded guilty to three offences under food and hygiene regulations in connection with a salmonella scare which led to the recall of more than 1m chocolate bars.

The company's barrister, Anthony Scrivener QC, entered the pleas on behalf of the firm during a 10-minute hearing at Birmingham magistrates court following a prosecution brought by Birmingham City Council.

The facts of the case were not opened at today's hearing and Cadbury will be sentenced for the offences at Birmingham crown court on July 13.

Mr Scrivener told the court that although certain facts in the case were still in dispute, Cadbury accepted its responsibility and was pleading guilty to the charges.

"They have already spent £20m on improvements," the QC said. "We accept that this case should be sent to the crown court for sentence."

Barry Berlin, appearing for Birmingham City Council, then told magistrates: "In these circumstances the matter can be committed to the crown court for sentence rather than for trial.

"The case, as you have heard, relates to three specific charges which I think you have seen. The prosecution accepts and agrees that these are serious matters which must be dealt with in the crown court."

The summons issued to Cadbury alleged that the company put "unsafe" contaminated chocolates on the market between January 19 and March 10 last year.

The other charges accused the confectionery giant of failing to immediately inform the relevant authorities about potential dangers and failing to identify "hazards" posed by the salmonella contamination.

Cadbury was the subject of an extensive investigation by both Birmingham City Council and Herefordshire Council after recalling more than 1m products on July 23 last year due to the contamination, which it blamed on a leaking pipe at its factory in Marlbrook, Herefordshire.

Herefordshire Council confirmed earlier today that it will prosecute Cadbury after an inquiry led by its environmental health team.

Labour's justice policy jails far too many people, says Hain

Labour's justice policy jails far too many people, says Hain


Women and black men suffer most, he says
Deputy leadership runners square up for debate

Tania Branigan and David Hencke
Friday June 15, 2007
The Guardian

Labour's criminal justice policy is unfair and ineffective, the deputy leadership candidate Peter Hain said yesterday, calling for more community-based sentences.

The Northern Ireland secretary warned that tough sentencing policies were "not working and not effective". They were particularly unfair to women inmates, most of whom had been locked up for non-violent crime, and young black men.

Mr Hain told the ePolitix website: "Far too many people are in prison who should not be in prison ... Prison is not working when the number of prisoners is shooting up, suicides are at record levels and the rate of reoffending is going up as well. We need a new approach that reserves prison for serious and violent offenders."

Hazel Blears, Labour's chairwoman, later suggested that the government had yet to convince voters that its criminal justice policies were working for them, as the six candidates to replace John Prescott faced each other on BBC1's Question Time. Alan Johnson, education secretary; Harriet Harman, justice minister; Hilary Benn, international development secretary and backbencher Jon Cruddas are also fighting for the role.

Earlier, it emerged that Ms Blears had taken a £10,000 donation for her campaign from a law firm that boasts it can cut compensation claims from workers "even in situations where the employer has an extremely weak case". The website of Peninsula Business Services Ltd, based in her Salford constituency, says it has overturned many employment tribunal decisions through reviews and appeals.

The Labour backbencher Kevan Jones, who as a former GMB official has defended workers against companies backed by Peninsula, said it was "disgraceful" that Ms Blears had taken money from such a firm: "She should give the money back."

Ms Blears said: "Peninsula is a reputable company, providing advice on health and safety and good employment systems to small organisations, helping them stay on the right side of the law. Their donation ... has been declared to the Electoral Commission in an open way."

John Hannett, general secretary of Usdaw, which is backing her, said: "While I do not know about this company, Hazel Blears takes the lead in our campaigns to protect trade unionists."

Peter Done, managing director of Peninsula, said: "We aim to improve industrial relations and harmony in the workplace and to resolve disputes at an early stage. Less than 1% of all the issues we advise on end up at employment tribunal."

Pull your trousers up or go to jail, warns Louisiana mayor

Pull your trousers up or go to jail, warns Louisiana mayor
By Leonard Doyle in Washington
Published: 15 June 2007

Call it the battle of the drooping drawers. Across the American South, a cry has gone out to ban sagging trousers that show the wearer's underwear. Bemused violators of the proposed law will be fined or end up in jail.

Deep in Cajun country, the mayor of the Louisiana town of Delcambre is about to sign into law a proposal that will make it a crime to wear trousers that show underwear. "If you expose your private parts, you'll get a fine [of up to $500 (£250)]," Mayor Carol Broussard said. Repeat offenders could land themselves a six-month stretch in jail.

From Baptist church halls to town halls, calls are being made for tough laws and regulations which populist politicians and god-fearing citizens say will restore dignity to their streets and shopping malls. Opponents say the measures are designed to harass young black males and other followers of hip-hop fashion. Civil liberties groups say they follow a long tradition of laws - many of them unenforceable - which are aimed squarely at the poor.

But Baptist ministers who support the ban say this is not the case. "We're tired of seeing kids' underwear," said the Rev Richard Burton, of Epiphany Baptist Church, a board member of the largest African American lobby, the NAACP.

Mayor Broussard of Delcambre also says that race is not an issue. "White people wear sagging pants, too. Anybody who wears these pants should be held responsible.

She added: "It's gotten way out of hand out here," and advises people who like to wear their pants low: "Just wear it properly. Cover your vital parts. I mean, if you expose your private parts, you'll get a fine. If you walk up and your pants drop, you get a fine. They're better off taking the pants off and just wearing a dress."

It is not only small-town Louisiana that is outraged by the sight of male underwear. In Dallas, an ambitious politician, Ron Price, backed by several city councillors will move to ban sagging pants within the city limits. He says he is fed up with people who walk the streets "with their pants below their buttocks and their underwear exposed."

But a spokeswoman for the American Civil Liberties Union is puzzled. "Why can't people just look away?" she asks, pointing out that the laws have to apply equally to males and females. In recent years, Louisiana and Virginia have tried to ban sagging pants, but the efforts went nowhere.

A shocking betrayal that shames our government

A shocking betrayal that shames our government


Sometimes, confronted with the absurdities of officialdom, you do not know whether to laugh or to cry. The release of Jamil el-Banna, a British resident held for the past four years at Guantanamo, is apparently being complicated because the British authorities refuse to allow him back. And on what grounds are they refusing? He is deemed to have forfeited his "indefinite leave to remain" by staying abroad for more than two years.

Now we know that the US administration had Camp Delta rebuilt and loses no opportunity to praise conditions there. We also know that it complies with some aspects - it decides which -of the Geneva Conventions. But Guantanamo is not exactly Club Med. It is a prison camp in an unpleasant climate zone, which exists - despite the best efforts of human rights campaigners and the US Supreme Court - in a judicial limbo.

For the British to argue that this period of involuntary detention annuls his asylum status is ridiculous. The suspicion must be that something more sinister than bureaucratic folly lies behind it. Was it that they were casting around for a pretext to keep Mr Banna out of Britain and this was the best they could come up with? And is it then their intention that he should be forced to return to Jordan, the country he fled more than 10 years ago? If so, the decision is not merely ridiculous, but cynical, immoral and unjust.

If Mr Banna was granted asylum in Britain - which he was - then this was because it was recognised that he faced a well-founded fear of persecution. In 2000 he was granted indefinite leave to remain. That should mean what it says, unless the authorities can prove that he deliberately flouted any conditions this entailed and knew what the consequences would be.

A year ago, Mr Banna was one of three British residents who tried, and failed, to compel the then foreign secretary, Jack Straw, to assist them, as he had assisted the British citizens whose release was - eventually - obtained. The court rejected their plea, on the grounds that residents are not guaranteed the same rights as citizens.

In the case of Mr Banna, however, and several of the other known British residents still held at Guantanamo, things cannot be so clear-cut. Mr Banna's case for being treated as a British national is particularly strong. He was legally resident, and his citizenship application was in train. His wife and five young children are British.

But it is not only his asylum status that makes Jamil el-Banna's case disquieting. He was not captured on a battlefield, in Afghanistan or anywhere else. He and an associate, Bisher al-Rawi, were detained when they arrived in Gambia on business. They were handed over to the US authorities, who "rendered" them to the notorious Bagram prison in Afghanistan, from where they were dispatched to Guantanamo.

It turned out that their arrest had been co-ordinated by British and US intelligence. It also turned out, from statements given to their lawyers, that both had been in contact with MI5. Once in US hands, they were in a double bind. They suffered all the liabilities from their contacts with Islamic groups but, as non-citizens, they enjoyed no protection. In the end, the British government interceded on behalf of Mr Rawi, who was released earlier this year. There can be no doubt it owes an equal obligation to Mr Banna. If there is evidence that his past activities have broken laws, he should be charged and tried in the normal way.

It is betrayal to deny someone refuge that has already been granted. It also traduces the principle that a person is innocent until guilt is proved. Worse still, it leaves the impression that this government is content to let the CIA do its dirty work. Let Jamil el-Banna return home.

Related article here.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Labour Deputy Leadership contest: Question Time

If BBC Question Time tonight is anything to go by for the Deputy Leadership contest of the Labour Party, Hilary Benn came across as a waffler. Peter Hain did not sparkle at all and appears to be a has been like Alastair Campbell and Peter Mandelson. Harriet Harman refused to answer the legal question, which legislation should be repealed, and sought to ask her own question to answer instead. Given that she is the Minister of Justice and a lawyer this dodging of the question is unacceptable.

In my view, the front runners are Alan Johnson for his stand on people in care. Jon Cruddas on abolishing Trident and being Old Labour (well Bob Piper?) and came across with honesty. And, Hazel Blears. I am not sure whether she has done herself up to look like a chipmunk as a result of Iain Dale giving her the nickname, or whether he calls her that because she already looked like one. In any event, she answered the questions with apparent honesty and if it is to go to a woman just because she is a woman then she knocks spots of Harriet Harman.

Diversity - a diverse opinion

Diversity - a diverse opinion



Lifer Charles Hanson concludes that race and religion now appear to be the dominant features of diversity

Quite recently, I was asked by a member of the prison staff to sign a form acknowledging that I understand the meaning of diversity and that I accept the meaning of diverse needs and rights to specific groups of prisoners which, in this instance, seemed to focus entirely on different ethnic and religious groups. At first I refused to sign, as what I was being asked to comply with seemed to be entirely misleading, for surely diversity should include all groups within the outside community and indeed the prisoner population, according to modern liberal and Prison Service thinking. It was on the pain of being transferred to another establishment that I acceded to the request to sign and set about looking deeper into what was, after all, a politically correct exercise.

Being coerced to undertake a social engineering exercise may satisfy the lentil-munching liberals of Islington but it hardly commends itself to free speech and freedom of thought. I have nothing against religion, although as a confirmed atheist and member of the National Secular Society, I would argue against the myths and superstitions of religious faith. Besides, I am certain that no wars or conflicts have started over non-belief. I am even more certain that religion and religious differences have, down through the years, claimed countless lives. However, I am simply contented to let sleeping dogs lie and let other people believe what they want to believe, as long as it is not imposed on me or that I have to accept it. Yet that is not enough for the ‘thought police’.

I have to agree perhaps that faith schools should be the norm for Christians, Muslims and Jews, which in my view is a form of self-imposed apartheid and also elitist; where particular faiths are able to shield their young from the ‘awfulness’ of the outside world and those who do not conform to their faith - and all in the name of diversity.

Likewise, I am being asked to agree to the rights of the twenty-five unelected Bishops of the House of Lords and the religious privilege which they enjoy. All of this goes against my secular beliefs and is in direct conflict with them, but my views do not count, for atheists have no rights other than to keep their views to themselves and are compelled to accept religious differences and the needs of their followers.

Perhaps I am also being asked to agree that Rastafarianism and Scientology should be proscribed or banned by the Prison Service as not being religious at all.

So there we have it. It's not what we, as prisoners, think that counts, it's what the ‘thought police’ and perhaps the wishy washy liberals think that is morally correct.

On the issue of ethnicity, it seems to me that it is precisely those wishy washy white, middle-class liberals who are the deciders of what counts and who they perceive are most offended. Take for example the decisions by certain councils to re-name Christmas as Winterval or to ban Punch and Judy shows for kids because it perpetuates domestic violence. It was clear from Muslim and other religious leaders that they weren't in the least offended by Christmas and some took part in the festivities themselves, even if they didn't count it as being one of their own.

As for Punch and Judy shows, there exists no evidence whatsoever that such entertainment, if you will, actually encourages domestic abuse unless we now have five year-olds already abusing their future wives.

It really is all a nonsense and the country, and no less the Prison Service, are spending fortunes on promoting a smug and so-called ‘happy and equal’ society. But diversity is supposed to be about all groups in society, many of which are always so seemingly absent on the agenda of diversity and not least of all on the form I was asked to sign.
There are the elderly, who quite shockingly are often ignored and neglected, not least of all in prison which I find more offensive than any discrimination which can be challenged and for which laws exist to combat. The same is true of disabled prisoners, and of course many afflictions can amount to a disability, many not so visible to others. The mentally ill are another group of prisoners who, like the elderly, are containable if they remain quiet and easily manageable by prison staff. But diversity? Their needs?

There is also the gay community but of course they don't count for the Prison Service, which does little more than pay lip service to their needs and rights. Women and children are also specific groups within the prison population .. but diversity for them?

Race and religion now appear to be the dominant features of so-called diversity, so much so that for the liberal it's become a crusade and an obsession, accompanied by a knee-jerk response along the way to any perceived discrimination. Diversity within the Prison Service is therefore highly selective and in keeping with current liberal obsessions and fashionable thinking.

History tells us that Nazi Germany formulated a social and racial engineering programme which saw the mentally ill (now called learning difficulties) being put to death in sanatoriums. This was followed by the elderly and the infirm, and eventually Auschwitz and millions of Jews, Gypsies, Gays and Trade Unionists. Indeed, the original ‘thought police’ at work with devastating consequences. Things are more subtle these days.

So, I stand somewhat against the accepted notion of diversity and feel as if old standards of thought and free expression have virtually been outlawed. We all have a responsibility to curtail any extreme form of belief or action, and free speech is not unlimited and does have its boundaries of what is acceptable and what is not. Indeed, legislation such as the Race Relations Act, Disability Discrimination Act and Age Discrimination Act, and various other Acts, exist to render accountable those who cross the line. And of course there are prison rules which forbid the same. So now I know that the diversity form I was compelled to sign, and which was limited to only two features of diversity, was little more than a politically correct exercise and a measure of a target driven ideology. The policy makers, who seem hell bent on attacking free speech and forcing us all to conform to ideological, politically correct diktats, might like to consider the following from Adolf Hitler in 1933:

“When an opponent declares, ‘I will not come over to your side,’ I calmly say, your children belong to us already. What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.”

The line of reasoning behind liberal thinking is that there exists a so-called community of similar needs and wants, and that equality of opportunity should be pursued at all costs for everyone. Yet of course this is totally unrealistic, as is the notion of community. Equality of opportunity is a noble aim but is it realistic? For don't we all have different skills and abilities? Disability, for example, makes it extremely unlikely that someone in a wheelchair would make a good firefighter, which a disabled person would readily acknowledge but not the liberal do-gooder who, by their thinking, would place them at risk.

I would merely ask the politically correct meddler if he or she would be willing to sit in a plane piloted by a blind man; allow a blind surgeon to operate on their brain; or have their children driven to school by a blind bus driver?

Community is also a notion which implies a brotherhood of man which clearly does not exist and it is doubtful if it ever has. There may be communities of varying sizes and types but certainly no national or indeed international community. Is a community therefore a place, and what kind of place is it? Is London a community, and how far does it reach? Does it include the suburbs? Even in a street, do we assume that all the residents comprise a ‘community’ of friendliness, basking in a genuine humanity and selflessness. I think not.

We often hear of the expression Gay community, Black community, Jewish community, Muslim community, Disabled and Elderly community, but to say that Gay people, all taken together in the same way as Black, Jewish, Muslim, Disabled and Elderly people, might be considered as individual communities is to say that they are all separate, that they associate amongst themselves but keep themselves aloof from others, and by virtue each group has common interests and all think alike. Again a total nonsense.

The use of the word ‘community’ tends to imply that there isn't a diversity of opinion and for those groups described above there is also a notion that by describing each and every group as such defines their whole identity. So much for liberal thinking, which seems to me to be far closer to fascism than one might believe.

The word ‘tolerance’ too is often used in promoting equal rights but I doubt that those most fervent in its promotion have given much thought to what tolerance actually means, for would it not be reasonable to suggest that being tolerant doesn't actually mean we have to like a person or their beliefs for we usually tolerate what we despise. It is often reported that a community is demanding or opposing some political action as though people act like bees with a hive mind. What is really happening is that some self-appointed community leader or spokesman, and their views, are taken as being representative of the entire group. This also happens within Government departments, so it comes as no surprise that I was asked to sign a form on diversity by one of their representatives.

There is clearly a political line from which we must not be allowed to deviate. Nazi Germany operated along the same lines as do most totalitarian dictatorships. We are therefore to be judged not by our understanding of acquired knowledge and morality but by our attitudes and conformity to what can often be contentious political opinions, often held by those who think they know what is best for others - the original ‘nanny squads’ and ‘thought police’, who seemingly are forever intent on patronising, condemning and penalising as many of their victims as possible in order to enforce their muddled worldly thinking upon us all.

• Charles Hanson is currently resident in HMP Blantyre House

Exclusive: Michael Barrymore arrested for murder



Michael Barrymore, aged 55, a comedian, actor, and entertainer, has been arrested on suspicion of murdering Stuart Lubbock, who was found dead in Barrymore's swimming pool in 2001. Barrymore is also facing charges of sexual assault. Two other men, one aged 37 and the other aged 32, have also been arrested on the same charges.

UPDATE: Sky News have now confirmed the story and named Michael Barrymore.

Updated update: BBC report almost names Barrymore and gives other details.

Mainstream media begin to catch up. From the Telegraph.

"It has been reported he had split with his long-term boyfriend and is mixing in London showbusiness circles again" (Sky News). Is this another kiss and tell?

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

David Cameron MP, RIP



Post-mortem result: Here. And here.

A New Delhi death sentence


A New Delhi death sentence

Posted by Peter Foster on 13 Jun 2007 at 13:00
Tags: New Delhi, Capital punishment, Prison, Heat stroke, Tihar

Astonishing story on the front page of today's Times of India which reports that six inmates of New Delhi's infamously brutal and over-crowded Tihar jail have died from heatstroke over the past week.

I've never been inside Tihar but a friend who has tells me that it's a hell-hole, built for 800 or so inmates but now hosting more than triple that figure in conditions that you could be jailed for keeping animals under in Europe.

This last week in Delhi has been insufferably hot with temperatures touching an inhuman 48C/118F - although I should say we've had some respite today with temperatures dipping to a breezy 40C/104F.

It's fruitless and unfair making direct comparisons between India and the developed world, but surely six dead inmates in six days is too many, even in India where life, like it or not, is cheap? And with 12 more inmates in hospital with heatstroke, there's a fair chance the death toll will rise.

Revealingly, the prison authorities, when challenged, defended the deaths by saying there was nothing untoward about them - no violence or brutality - but all were "natural" and "caused due to the intense heat conditions".

So that's all right then. Tihar was supposed to have been 'transformed' by Kiran Bedi, India's woman super-cop who went on to work for the UN department of peacekeeping operations, but from these figures it looks like there's still plenty of work to do.

The combination of poor ventilation and frequent power-cuts that stop the fans in the low-roofed barracks, temperatures rise to the point beyond which human beings aren't designed to survive, particularly if they are already weak and sick.

To be fair the authorities have acted, if a little too late, by offering the inmates unlimited 'lemon water', wet sheets and some ice cubes in the hope of keeping a few more of them alive.

Last year, the Times reports, 23 prisoners died in Tihar, a slight improvement on the 27 who died in 2005. But already this year 18 inmates have died which means the jail is heading for an unenviable record if this summer keeps up.

India is among the dwindling countries of the world that retains the death penalty, although it uses it very sparingly indeed.

And yet for an average of 25 inmates per year, being sent to serve time in the 'Black Hole of Tihar' has amounted to the same thing - a death sentence carried out by one of India's chief executioners - criminal neglect.
Posted by Peter Foster on 13 Jun 2007 at 13:00

Castration plan for paedophiles

The chemical castration of paedophiles may solve part of the problem. However, an opposing view is expressed here. I am aware that women are less likely to be engaged in sex offences, nevertheless, how does one chemically castrate a woman paedophile? And, isn't this policy advanced by John Reid sexist and against the Sex Discrimination Act?

I quite like the idea of lie detector tests.

Whilst I am not suggesting that Gerry and Kate McCann are paedophiles. Still, it might be a good idea to ask them if they will voluntarily undergo a lie detector test to determine whether they are telling the truth about the alleged abduction of Madeliene?

Protecting children

Protecting children

Lifer Ben Gunn looks at the highly emotive issue of child
protection and calls for more honesty and clarity, along with a national debate free of intervention from the terrible tabloids

A sex offender couldn't write this article without having an accusation levelled against him of being self-serving. As a common-or-garden murderer, without any personal stake, these jottings may just prompt a little more thought.

There are many things that society appears to have a consensus around, and that we should protect our children is quite naturally one of them. You don't see anybody arguing that we shouldn't protect children. So we all agree, and start from the same place on this.

It's at this point that the defining characteristics of what it means to be human go out the window. Reason, coherent thinking, understanding consequences, are all trashed in the rush to shout ‘protect the kids’. The problem is, in the cause of protecting kids a fair number of people talk utter crap, and in their mindless banner-waving they actually put children at risk. Mindless hatred makes a terrible basis for public debate and an even worse basis for making law.

Honesty and clarity should be the call of the day. Identify the problem, measure it, define it, and then address it. This isn't rocket science. But we are all too ready to support morons who burn out paediatricians - it’s a lot easier than looking at uncomfortable truths. Finding a bogeyman and kicking him is great popular entertainment, true, but lets not substitute it for a little brain power and honesty.

Just an aside - people seem to take a lot of children on anti-paedo marches, even dressing them up with sloganising t-shirts. This strikes me as being in extremely poor taste at best - if the kids don't yet know about paedophiles then leave them that innocence. Don't sit them down and explain the horrors, or expose them to mass hatred. It just strikes me as being rather a funny way of protecting kids.

Now some unfortunate truths. The group of people most at risk of being killed are those under the age of one. Not the
pensioners. Not even the dreaded hoodie generation. No, out of all, it’s the little rug-rat who is far more likely to be murdered. Here's the important point - about 5 kids a year are killed by strangers; the figure has been constant for decades. All the rest - scores of them - are killed by their parents or others known to them. Forget walking home from school down dark alleys as being risky; the really dangerous bit is when you go through your own front door.

Now, if we are going to put child protection at the top of the list, instead of just shouting about it we would have to recognise that the mad crowd who went on the rampage through Portsmouth, goaded on by the News of the World, contained far more child killers than they were looking for.

Uncomfortable business this child protection isn't it? The reality is a lot more difficult than the popular bogeyman. If we were to pass laws based on this reality, we would save a lot more kids if people were banned from having children unless they were passed as being acceptable parents. If we get that risk assessment right, then we would save the lives of dozens of kids a year.
But we don't even consider the option. Not even the loudest, maddest protestor would suffer being assessed to see if he was a risk to his own kids. It is much easier to see the danger ‘out there’, the bush-lurker, the playground loiterer. It is easier to look at the News of the World than it is to look in the mirror, to look at the people you work and drink with. People just don't like the truth; no matter how much they shout about child protection, they don't want it to affect themselves, no matter how many kids it saves.

Now, sex offenders. The popular mind (such as it is) has it that these people are incurable and unstoppable, short of castration or death. An awful lot of laws are now based on this collective delusion - because it just isn't true. Worse, the perpetual hyping-up of ‘stranger danger’ is to take attention away from the real dangers. Another aside - why does the attention always focus on the school playground? It conjures up visions of perverts sweeping through the school gates, grabbing a young child under each arm and making off like a rugby international. I have never heard of anything remotely like it happening. Ever.

If anything, kids are safest in the school yard. Because over 90 per cent of abusers are known to the victim, being either family or friends of the family. Again, the danger comes from entering your own front door, not playing in the streets unsupervised.

As for their rates of reoffending, hold onto your hats. Sex offenders have the second lowest rate of reoffending, after lifers: about 14 per cent, with only one in five of those being related to kids. Whilst the popular conception has it that as soon as the prison gates are open they are off to buy a ski-mask and a bag of sweets, the reality is chronically different.

And I still can't get my head around the fact that of new sex offences committed by ex-prisoners, the overwhelming majority are committed by those not previously convicted of a sex crime.

This tends to make you question the whole ‘lock them up for life’ bit. The burglars and blaggers on the landing are more likely to engage in ‘noncing’ on release than the nonces are. If we were to take child protection seriously, then it is the nonces who should get parole and the blaggers kept in forever.

Weird, isn't it, how some solid truths can undermine so many of our dearly held conceptions around our efforts in child protection. As I started off pointing out that we all agree child protection is a good thing, I want to end by wondering how many people now think the current efforts are misplaced and silly, and do more harm to kids than good. We really do need to have a national debate, but not one whose terms are dictated by the terrible tabloids. Child protection is a good thing - so when are we going to get it?

• Ben Gunn is currently resident in HMP Shepton Mallet

The hidden death penalty


The hidden death penalty

Marie Szewczyk describes how she embarked on a self-destructive journey and cultivated the illusion that to be thin would bring happiness

In prison, many women experience a reduced self-esteem, sometimes self-loathing, torment and guilt. By its very nature a prison sentence carries a stigma that can be a lifelong burden and the after effects never fully disappear. This in itself can be very debilitating but for some women there is another sentence which might be served as a result of the experience of imprisonment, which can become a death penalty.



The prison authorities have full control over everyday life and often the only thing prisoners can control is their diet. They are told when to go to bed, when to get up and when to eat. Sometimes there is insufficient choice of food and therefore they are told what to eat, but never how much to eat. Quite often ‘eating distress’ results from trauma or from an urge to manipulate the only thing we have control over.

In my case, what crime had I committed at the age of 8 that sentenced me to 25 years of secrecy and self blame? A sentence that recently, at under 5 stone, exercising compulsively for 5 hours a day, almost cost me my life? My crime? Being just that bit too fat, unaware, more through the innocence of childhood, I embarked on a journey of a self-destructive relationship with food. It became my companion and best friend but paradoxically my enemy, as I sought comfort to console myself following the traumatic events I was to experience during the first 30 years of my life.

I was punished by my guilt and the constant ridicule and bullying by others as I cultivated that familiar illusion that to be thin would bring happiness. I would be able to accept myself and, more importantly, others would accept me.

For those experiencing eating distress of some form, they may or may not be aware that the obsession with food, weight and shape is merely a focus for the far deeper-rooted complex causes from which we are really trying to escape.

The sufferer goes through hell, torturing her/himself by counting every single calorie of every morsel put in their mouth or going to extreme measures to avoid or limit every bit of carbohydrate or fat that the anorexic voice convinces will make them balloon. There is the constant body checking, secret behaviour, hiding food, vomiting, laxative/diuretic abuse and binning food.

Longing on the one hand for somebody to rescue them from this misery, but terrified that the one thing in their lives they still have control over will be taken away. If you take away our anorexia, where will we run to? What will we do with our overwhelming feelings of guilt, responsibility and anger? Who is going to help me deal with those emotions that the eating distress has deadened or become a focus for, if we start to allow ourselves to feel them.

Nobody resorts to crime without a reason and it's the same with anorexia. There is always an underlying cause eating away at the soul of the offender.

Are the skills, the support and the resources available within the prison system to help sufferers, and are they appropriate? Is there even the right level of awareness of this ever increasing problem?

Just because a prisoner attends the dining room, or takes food to her/his cell three times a day doesn't mean there isn't a problem. Does anybody notice the gradual yet alarming weight loss, resulting in the skeletal frame that wanders, cold, withdrawn and dressed in layers on the exercise yard to hide their diminishing body?

Are you, as a sufferer, aware of the change in your behaviour, thoughts and feelings around food and the way your body appears to you? Are your hours spent thinking of food and the meals you'll create for your family when you get home?

Be aware earlier rather than later, anorexia is a life-threatening disease that doesn't go away when you reach your target weight. The only way to avoid the ‘hidden sentence’ is to reach out and go outwards, not inwards, with your suffering. Break the cycle of guilt before you're in it for life, without licence.

Ask the prison healthcare staff if you can talk to an ‘expert by experience’, somebody who knows the problems having suffered themselves. Can a support meeting be arranged for people that will help them to avoid being lost to a sentence that doesn't end when you walk out of the prison gate?

Although recovery may seem a long way off, if not impossible, I firmly believe through my experience of a life of anorexia, bulimia, alcoholism, drug addiction and self-harm, that each individual has the incredible strength and power within them to recover from this illness. The first step is the acknowledgement to oneself that there is a problem. Secondly, finding the determination to resolve to change and then asking for the resources, materials and support of other people who can help you make that journey.

• Marie is currently in the process of setting up a community outreach support group based at Gemini in Oxford for people in the Midlands experiencing eating disorders. Contact Marie Szewczyk at: Gemini, The Rectory Centre, Rectory Road, Cowley, Oxford OX4 1BU. Tel: 01865 455611.

Human rights law applies in Iraq killing, lords rule

10.30am
Human rights law applies in Iraq killing, lords rule


Matthew Weaver
Wednesday June 13, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

The House of Lords has delivered a resounding blow to British conduct in the war in Iraq by ruling that human rights law applies in the case of an Iraqi civilian killed by UK troops.

The law lords decided that the UK was obliged to conduct an independent investigation into the death of Baha Mousa, who died in British custody in Basra in 2003.

In a four to one verdict, the lords ruled that the UK's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the conduct of British troops.

They upheld a court of appeal ruling of December 2005 that the UK authorities had "extra-territorial jurisdiction" concerning Mr Mousa, a 26-year-old hotel worker.

But the families of five other Iraqi civilians killed in different incidents in Basra, who were not being detained, were told their cases were not covered by UK human rights law.

More on the story here.

House of Lords judgment here.

Child Protection on line petition to investigate the McCanns

There are a growing number of people who are not satisfied with Gerry and Kate McCanns explanations into the disappearance of Madeliene and the neglect and or abandonment of their twins for 3 hours whilst they went for a meal and drinks. Please click the link below and sign the petition.

BBC story here.

Child Protection



View Current Signatures - Sign the Petition

To: Leicestershire Social Services

"We the undersigned request that Leicestershire Social Services fulfil their statutory obligation to investigate the circumstances which led to 3 year old Madeleine McCann and her younger siblings being left unattended in an unlocked, ground floor hotel room.

We ask that they do this to reflect an evenhanded approach to the important issue of child protection.

We also wish to ensure that no parent will ever be able to evade responsibility for the safety and welfare of their children by citing the example of Mr and Mrs McCann, whose negligence is unreasonably being discounted in the tidal wave of sympathy brought about as a consequence of their media campaign".

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

Sex assault PC faces prison and the sack

Sex assault PC faces prison and the sack

A DYFED Powys police constable broke down in tears this afternoon as a jury convicted him of sexually molesting a female prisoner in the back of a squad car. Pc Richard James Bowen lied about twice mas- turbating in front of her and trying to force his hand down into her black thong. Bowen, 31, faces jail and certain dismissal after being convicted unanimously of misconduct in public office and two offences of indecent exposure. Bowen could face even more trouble after it emerged that he sent a series of mobile ‘phone text messages from the dock of Swansea crown court during his trial. Bowen was supposed to be following the case and at one stage seemed to be distressed and holding his head in his hands. In fact, he was sending and receiving a string of text messages. Which was precisely what he did while roaring down the M4 motorway at 80 mph on April 6, 2006. Then he was swapping sexy messages with his lover Llinos. After receiving a “love and miss you, kisses Baba” message Bowen pulled into the Leigh Delamere services and asked WPC Christina Berry to take over at the wheel of the unmarked Ford Escort. Bowen, in full uniform, climbed into the back and for the next two hours wrote suggestive notes to the 25 year old prisoner sitting next to him. When she failed to respond he twice mas- turbated in front of her. Bowen lied to colleagues about what had hap- pened. But forensic scientist Geoffrey Robinson found up to 70 per cent of his handkerchief to be stained in his semen. There was also semen on the back seat. PCs Bowen and Berry had been sent from west Wales to London to collect a woman suspected of stealing a BMW sports car. Bowen, of Cardigan, west Wales, was convicted after a 10 day trial. A charge of sexual assault was dropped after Judge Christopher Morton ruled it was covered by the misconduct offence. Bowen will be sentenced on June 14 after pro- bation officers have prepared a report into his background. His barrister, Chris Clee, said Bowen “fully understands the consequences of conviction.” “Clearly the offences cross the custody thresh- old, he understands that,” he added. Judge Morton granted Bowen bail meanwhile but warned him that was not an indication of what the sentence would be. “The seriousness is obvious and there will be consequences other than the sentence. These are very serious matters,” he added. Bowen was ordered to live with his parents in Cardigan until he is sentenced. During his trial the jury heard he was from a highly respected family. A testimonial from a local magistrate described him as “a credit to his parents. He is industrious by nature and gives up a lot of his spare time to help charities.” The court heard Bowen was a member of Pop- pet Sands Surf Life Saving Club, Cardigan Golf Club and an ex playing member of Cardigan Rugby Club. Eleanor Jones, the deacon of his church, Cardi- gan Tabernacle Presbyterian, said Bowen was of excellent character and came from a loving family. “His parents are an asset to the community and he is following in their footsteps,” she added.

Hat-Tip to Maneatingcheesesandwich for this story.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Bush's watch stolen in Albania - Gone in 60 seconds




Watch stolen when the count down gets to 3 minutes 10 seconds.

It strikes me that if Bush's watch was so easily stolen by someone in the crowd, that person could just as easily have been an assassin with a syringe containing a lethal dose of poison...

Could this be it? Offered for $14.99 on E-Bay.

Hazel Blears and six other Labour MPs have a lucky escape as building collapses

One trapped as building collapses

Dean Farrar Street, blocked by rubble

One person has been injured and another remains trapped after the top two floors of a five-storey building in central London collapsed.

The emergency services were called to Dean Farrar Street in Westminster at 1604 BST on Tuesday.

The London Fire Service said one person was being treated for minor injuries and police said one other person remained trapped in the building.

The building houses the campaign office of Labour chair Hazel Blears.

A spokesman for Ms Blears said none of her staff had been hurt.

Ms Blears and six other MPs spent several hours in the offices on the fourth and fifth floor at lunchtime today, he added.

Six fire engines, 50 firefighters and two urban search and rescue vehicles are at the scene.

The top floors were undergoing renovation at the time of the collapse.

Police said rescue services were in contact with the trapped person, believed to be a builder.

There was no evidence of an explosion and structural failure is thought to be the cause, police added.


Eyewitness Anthony Gilberthorpe told BBC News 24: "It happened just so very quick one didn't know what to do.

"I heard a mighty explosion and about two floors and the roof of a building to my left hand side was literally showering down in front of me.

"So I literally threw myself, literally jumped up and threw myself, to the right hand side of the road not knowing whether I was going to be hit."

Mr Gilberthorpe saw a van driver step out of his vehicle moments before it was hit by a huge piece of debris.

"What I did see which was quite shocking was a huge boulder went right through his vehicle, literally where he had been 15 seconds previously and I think that's the most frightening thing that I actually witnessed.

There were six of Ms Blears campaign volunteers in the offices at the time of the collapse.

One of them, Sean Newman, said: "Some of us who were upstairs felt the building shake.

"Then we heard the alarm go off and left our stuff to go downstairs. It was a calm evacuation, but they would not let us go back in."

He estimated that there were around 50 businesses based in the premises.

Justin Linger was also working in the building at the time of the collapse.

"I was just sitting in the office when all of a sudden the whole building shook," he told BBC News 24.

"As one of my colleagues put it, the building disco danced."

Scotland Yard said the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) would be responsible for determining the cause of the collapse.

Tony Blair: It wasn't me guv honest it was them...


Tony Blair, according to Tony Blair, is not to blame for his bad governance in Number Ten, rather it is the fault of the media.

Blair has a hand in manipulating the media. Now he's sweating like fuck...





"New Labour was very happy to tango with the media until it went wrong - most spectacularly over the Iraq dossiers and Hutton. We've had Brown admitting in the past 24 hours that the government was wrong over the dossiers. Does Blair agree with his successor?"

Mr d'Ancona also disagreed with the prime minister's assessment that the growth of new media had damaged politics.

"I don't think the proliferation of new media is bad for politics: quite the opposite. It may be bad for the present government, but that's not the same thing."


Meanwhile, Iain Dale posts on a Sunday story about Le Pen...top Tory political blogger my arse!

I cannot help thinking whether Tony Blair is fit for purpose to lecture us on anything. I think it is a disgrace to call himself "The Right Honourable". There are some who believe that he is more Right than Left when it comes to politics. However, I feel that it is more fitting if he calls himself the dishonourable Tony Blair MP.

It is true that being the Prime Minister he is in the realm of Public Life. And with this comes a duty to represent those who voted him into office. I feel that we have been sadly let down in this respect.

Tony Blair's speech is meant to look at the effect of a changing world on the issues of the future, and the challenge of the changing nature of communication on politics and the media.

Wading through the bullshit, my shovel suddenly struck a tiny nugget of gold. There is an admission that he has misled the public, and he apologises for this deception. "...it is in all our interests that the public is properly and accurately informed. They are the priority and they are not well served by the current state of affairs...I first acknowledge my own complicity".

He is seeking public forgiveness.


UPDATE: Nick Robinson's take here.

400% - Crimes by prisoners released on electronic tags have increased fourfold in the last 5 years

400%

Crimes by prisoners released on electronic tags have increased fourfold in the last 5 years


By Eric McGraw



When electronic tagging was introduced in 1999, just 1 in 40 individuals committed a crime whilst wearing a tag. Last year, the figure was 1 in 9 a Report has found.

Since January 1999, over 137,000 people have been placed on the Home Detention Curfew (HDC) scheme, one of the largest electronic monitoring programmes in the world.

The Home Office say the scheme is ‘designed to ease the transition of prisoners from custody to the community’. But seven years and £342 million later, HDC has proven to be ‘expensive and inefficient, whilst contributing to an increased level of crime’, the Report claims.

Conservative MP Grant Shapps, who has compiled the Report based on Parliamentary Questions and Home Office research, says that the failings of electronic tagging is a result of ‘inappropriate prisoner selection’. He claims that the HDC scheme ‘is now being driven by a Home Office requirement to rely on tagging in order to ease the overcrowding in our prison system.’

The MP’s Report highlights the fact that in the last two years, Home Detention Curfew has been granted to 36,590 offenders at a cost of £161.9 million. More than 4,000 offences have been committed while people were subject to the conditions of the tag.

The total number of crimes include at least 1,000 violent offences - among them a murder, a rape, four cases of manslaughter, 56 wounding and more than 700 assaults – 145 of them against police officers. Tagged offenders have also committed 20 sex offences and been involved in 100 cases of possessing offensive weapons and one of causing death by reckless driving.

Grant Shapps told Inside Time: ‘Far from saving money, the fact that 1 in 9 of those wearing tags reoffends means that the social cost of the HDC programme is much higher than had originally been thought. It is now clear that the prison population crisis has led to thousands of additional crimes by prisoners who have been selected for electronic tagging and thereby released too early from prison’.

The Home Office point out that the increase in reoffending by prisoners released on electronic tags is to be expected because since 2003 the maximum curfew period increased from 60 days to 135 days. They also say that the increased reoffending rate last year of 1 in 9 or 11.5% involves a very small percentage of those released on the scheme.

The Tagging Game by Grant Shapps MP

How to deal with complaints...

The McCanns: Visiting Royalty?


Why am I reminded of the rent a crowd that lined Downing Street following the Labour victory in 1997 when I see this picture? Why should the McCanns be so surprised by the turn out when they employ a PR team? The children all just happened to have photos of Madeliene...

Yuk!

The gospel according to Paris Hilton

And it came to pass that God spake to Paris Hilton. He said: "Paris you have got to stop acting dumb". There was a flash of light...And Paris said:

"I'm not the same person I was. I used to act dumb. It was an act. I am 26 years old, and that act is no longer cute. Now, I would like to make a difference. God has given me this new chance."

Hallelujah!

Journey to nowhere


Journey to nowhere


For the growing prison population of lifers trapped in a black hole of hopelessness, even death might seem a better alternative, says Erwin James.

Monday June 11, 2007
SocietyGuardian.co.uk

In 1979 the average time a "lifer" spent in prison in the UK was nine years. Now it's around 15 or 16, although minimum terms of 30 years plus are regularly handed down by the courts to those who commit the most serious offences.

As a consequence, "doing life" in a British prison has never been more arduous. Nobody outside is complaining, however, although the lord chief justice, Lord Phillips, did comment a while ago that the increasingly long fixed terms given to those whose crimes merit a life sentence means that we are in danger of creating a whole generation of "geriatric lifers".

Most victims of life-sentenced prisoners would be hard pressed to be concerned, I guess. The idea that people who cause suffering to others deserve all they get is a perfectly reasonable one, and there is a still a significant number of the law-abiding majority who believe that life should mean life.

But only around 30 life-sentenced prisoners in fact will serve "natural life" (Ian Huntley and Rose West are perhaps the most easily identified among this group). The majority one day will be released. For the individual serving the time, however, it is a hope than can be difficult to hold on to.

This was brought to the attention of the Italian public recently when more than 300 of their countrymen serving life co-signed a letter from a convicted gangster urging Italy's president, Giorgio Napolitano, to bring back the death penalty. The letter, written by 52-year-old Carmelo Musumeci who has been in prison for 17 years, was candid. Musumeci said he was tired of "dying a little bit every day". We want to die just once, he said, "and we are asking for our life sentence to be changed to a death sentence".

By all accounts, Musumeci has made great changes in his life in prison. The fact that he has passed high school exams and achieved a degree in law demonstrates how constructively he has used his prison time. But his sentence, he says, "has transformed the light into shadows". He told the president his future was the same as his past, "killing the present and removing every hope".

Doubtless, victims of serious crime and those constantly calling for tougher sentences will have little sympathy for the likes of Musumeci. But there will be many life-sentenced prisoners in the UK who will be able to empathise with him. As someone who has been through the experience and managed to get out the other end, I certainly can.

I remember a fellow prisoner serving life in the next cell to mine sticking a note on his cell door that read: "The light at the end of the tunnel has been switched off." Hopelessness abounds among the lifer population. Many fail to get to the end, some commit suicide, some die of natural causes. Doing life can seem like a hopeless existence, an endless journey to nowhere.

For those who keep going, the struggle not to give in to despair is a tough one. And I think it is going to get worse. In 1979 there were fewer than 2,000 lifers in the system. Now there are 8,000-plus, a figure set to rise spectacularly due to the introduction of the new ISPP (indeterminate sentence for public protection).

Such sentences are usually accompanied by shorter tariffs, perhaps as low as two or three years. In reality the system is not geared to operate at such a pace. And since the sentences are based on risk, it is harder to convince the authorities that risk has been reduced, hence many ISPP prisoners will end up serving not much less than the average life sentence.

Home Office predictions suggest there will be upwards of 20,000 people in prison serving ISPPs by 2015. It should come as no surprise if, sooner rather than later, we hear words similar to those of Carmelo Musumeci and his associates coming from British prison cells.

Monday, June 11, 2007

Senior judge 'exposed himself' on train


Senior judge 'exposed himself' on train

By Natalie Paris and agencies
Last Updated: 1:49pm BST 11/06/2007

A 'kind-looking' senior judge allegedly exposed himself to a woman on a train, a court has heard.

A female witness told London's City of Westminster Magistrates' Court today that Lord Justice Richards flashed at her while she journeyed between Wimbledon and Waterloo during rush hour.

Sir Stephen Richards, a 56-year-old who sits in the Court of Appeal, denies the claims and has pleaded not guilty to two counts of exposure.

The woman recalled her "shock and embarrassment" at being flashed at on the crowded train on October 16.

She noticed that a well-dressed, grey-haired man, aged between 55 to 60 years, was exposing himself to her when she glanced down at the bottom of her newspaper.

She told the court: "Because I was embarrassed and nothing like this had happened to me before, I assumed this was an accident.

"I did not want to draw attention to the situation, to me or to the gentleman, so I carried on reading my paper."

She said the man would sometimes adjust himself slightly, exposing himself to varying amounts.

She described him as presentable and kind-looking, "which is why initially I thought this was an accident".

She later identified the man by video as father-of-three, Sir Stephen.

It is alleged that he exposed himself to a woman on two separate occasions on a train between October 16 and October 24.

Sir Stephen, from Wimbledon, south-west London, is charged with two counts of "intentionally exposing his genitals intending that someone would see them and would be caused alarm or distressed".


UPDATE: I suspect that the case will not be proved by the prosecution. I quite like the witnesses statement where she said she kept looking down at him just to make sure that she was not mistaken.

UPDATED update: As I was saying. I told you so...

Never mind the 2012 Olympic logo...


With all this fuss over the 2012 Olympics logo, perhaps we are losing sight of what is happening in the run up to the 2008 Olympics to be held in China. And, that is, Chinese child slave labour.

Lord Goldsmith in conspiracy to pervert the course of justice


It has emerged that Lord Goldsmith has conspired with others to attempt to pervert the course of justice in the BAE/Saudi arms scandal.

"Attention is focusing on a key meeting in Whitehall in March, when unnamed Ministry of Defence officials joined the attorney general's staff and SFO investigators in composing a strategy.

Critics say there seems to have been a deliberate attempt to deceive the international community".


Other links to this story here, here, here and here.

I do have a lot of respect for Lord Woolf, and he may well be the right choice to head up an "independent" inquiry. However, I do remember him judging one of my cases and rather than put the Prison Service under pressure he chose to allow them to get off the hook.

Thousands of sex offenders receive cautions

Thousands of sex offenders receive cautions.

"Almost 8,000 sex offenders have received a police caution rather than being charged in the past five years, it emerged today".

I am staggered by this amount. And, it would appear that it could be much higher because "Only one force, West Yorkshire police, failed to provide figures, saying it would be too expensive to search for the facts". A pathetic excuse if ever I heard one!

One would have thought that we were talking about minor offences here, and not serious crimes including 230 rapes and almost 2,000 offences involving children.

"Cautions would be given in circumstances where the victim of a rape did not turn up to give evidence in court or, for example, the case involved a 16-year-old boy having consensual sex with a 15-year-old". I did not realise that a 15 year old girl could give consent for sex at least until she was 16 years of age...

"A spokeswoman for the Ministry of Justice said "very few" of the cautions were for raping children". Oh that's alright then is it? Like fuck it is!

UPDATE: How can a rapist only be cautioned?

Latest results...

It's a 1 - 1 draw:

Police shoot person dead.



UPDATE: I thought it odd that this report was so vague. And, when it referred to person as opposed to a man I wondered if it was a woman. Unless she was armed to the teeth like Rambo, I suspect that this will take some justifying.

Policeman dies after stabbing.