Site Meter

Friday, November 21, 2008

Jack Straw's stand-up comedy routine?


Jack Straw's stand-up comedy routine?

I do question why a stand-up comedy course for 18 prisoners costs £8,000 for 8 days. It does seem a tad expensive. Therefore, it does appear to lack justification to burden the taxpayers with this bill. I don't see anything wrong with prisoners engaging in such a course, and as this article points out it has been running for 10 years. Because somebody decides to get in touch with the Sun, all of a sudden it becomes something that requires the attention of Jack Straw. I am surprised that he does not do stand-up comedy with his punishment/reform mantra. He goes on about the cost to the taxpayers, and yet thinks nothing of pouring good money after bad down the drain which is the penal system. And, then we have him embarking on the Titan Prisons project which everybody tells him is doomed to fail. As for publicly acceptable, his failure to implement the prisoners votes is not publicly acceptable. Nor was his involvement in the torture of suspected terrorists, where the CIA used British soil to carry out their dirty deeds before locking them up without charge and trial in Guantanamo Bay.

More of the same...

Al-Qaeda terrorist taught stand-up comedy at top-security prison

I wonder if there are plans to prevent Basil Brush using his offensive punchline "Boom Boom!"?


A prisoner rides his motorbike down the landing at HM Prison Whitemoor as prisoners practice their stand-up comedy routines...

4 comments:

James Higham said...

He'll be one of the first up against the wall.

Anonymous said...

nice to see that straw is giving his highly paid attention to the most pressing of issues affecting the prison system....

Anonymous said...

How about THIS one then?

Anonymous said...

I cannot stand this awful man, Jack Straw. I've written to him many times. I asked him why an American psychologist who stated that the human rights of pedophiles should come before the rights of their victims was allowed to influence a 2005 Government consultation paper on family law, and I showed him the evidence. He oiled his way round the question and pretended it hadn't happened. I'm fed up of him, what an appalling man he is - he ought not be in government at all.

Zoompad