Judges decide to cover up for guilty judges
Names of judges found guilty of misconduct to stay secret
• Straw wins four-year battle to keep identities hidden
• Challenge by Guardian rejected by tribunal
The government and the judiciary can continue to conceal the names of more than 170 misbehaving judges, a freedom of information tribunal has ruled.
The judge heading the tribunal decided that some members of the judiciary who have been sacked or reprimanded for misconduct would suffer "great distress" if details of their misdemeanours were made public.
The judges' authority in the courtroom would be undermined, and their privacy unjustifiably invaded, if the public were allowed to know how they had been disciplined, according to the tribunal.
The ruling came out in favour of justice secretary, Jack Straw, and the judiciary as they have fought a four-year battle to hide the identities of miscreants.
I think it is disgusting that 170 dishonest judges have their bad reputations protected so the public will be fooled into believing that they are honest!
Related content...
Justices should be seen to be done
A ruling that the disciplining of judges can remain secret is an outrageous departure from the trend towards transparency
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
Site Meter
Showing posts with label Judges decide to cover up for guilty judges. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judges decide to cover up for guilty judges. Show all posts
Monday, June 15, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)