Was there a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice in Lord Ahmed's case?
The outside lane on motorways are for overtaking. When Lord Ahmed crashed into the broken down car and killing the driver he was not overtaking any vehicle.
If as the Telegraph reports In 2009 he was jailed for dangerous driving after sending and receiving text messages minutes before being involved in a fatal motorway crash he was texting minutes before rather than seconds before surely he would have avoided crashing?
Mysteriously he was not charged with causing death by dangerous driving. But instead the lesser charge. His lenient sentence was further reduced when the Establishment needed him to curb Muslim extremists.
The last thing Ahmed should be gobbing off about is a Jewish conspiracy...
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
2 comments:
No, it looks like it was an unfortunate incident that the car got broken down on motorway, ended up on the fast lane and that there was someone in it at the time of the collision.
But to give only 16 days of jail for sending and receiving text messages on motorway (it's mad, not aggravating, factor that it was pitch dark!) - yup, perverting the course of justice! Defo!
The death was unnecessary and is obviously sad but you just don't stay in a car broken down on a fast lane. Apparently, its owner came back to that car for his mobile phone.
Post a Comment