A victory for terrorism?
I think it is a disappointing that the House of Lords has ruled it as lawful for a terrorist suspect and his lawyer to be excluded from a hearing before a judge where an application for extending detention was being made.
I fail to see how a suspect or a legal representative can argue against a case which is heard in secret and denies them the opportunity of knowing the case against them that they have to meet.
In my view, its a victory for terrorism.
Hat-Tip to Head of Legal.
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
Site Meter
Showing posts with label A victory for terrorism?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label A victory for terrorism?. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)