Bring these men to trial – or revoke their control orders
It's not only the law lords who are confused about the threat the controlees pose. What has the Home Office got to lose?
The conviction of three men for conspiring to murder using explosives on aircraft brings a set of competing nightmares into the debate about terrorism. The images of the death and destruction apparently planned by Abdulla Ali, Assad Sarwar and Tanvir Hussain on transatlantic airliners are terrifying to watch and rewarding for the intelligence services, who describe their operation disrupting the plot as "their most significant investigation ever undertaken".
On the other hand, for 19 men also accused of involvement in terrorism, but who have not had the luxury of a trial at crown court, their severely restricted existence under a regime of control orders is, according to the House of Lords, also "the stuff of nightmares".
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
Site Meter
Showing posts with label terror suspects. Show all posts
Showing posts with label terror suspects. Show all posts
Monday, September 07, 2009
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Its official: The Treasury is a department for security
Its official: The Treasury is a department for security
According to the H.M. Treasury website:
"The Treasury is the United Kingdom's economics and finance ministry. It is responsible for formulating and implementing the Government's financial and economic policy. Its aim is to raise the rate of sustainable growth, and achieve rising prosperity and a better quality of life with economic and employment opportunities for all".
Gordon Brown, before becoming the Prime Minister, was the Chancellor. According to The Times:
"The power to designate people as terror suspects and freeze their finances was introduced without parliamentary debate by Mr Brown when he was Chancellor. He has declared that the Treasury has become a “department for security”".
Isn't calling a department for security The Treasury rather like Hitler calling the gas chambers The Showers?
Like the courts, I would question whether the then Chancellor had the public power to act as he did. It used to be that a suspect was an innocent person and remained such until charged with a crime and found guilty by a court at which time sanctions would be imposed. There is something quite frightening about a government department which designates certain people as terror suspects, and refuses to inform them of the details of the allegations against them so that they can challenge the accusations, and yet freeze their finances and they have to justify what they have spent £10 on. Given that MPs do not have to provide receipts for the £25 they can claim each day on expenses, it is a bit rich demanding innocent people justify the expenditure of £10.
When we get more terrorised by the government than we do by the so-called terrorist suspects, its time to let that government know it will not be tolerated.
According to the H.M. Treasury website:
"The Treasury is the United Kingdom's economics and finance ministry. It is responsible for formulating and implementing the Government's financial and economic policy. Its aim is to raise the rate of sustainable growth, and achieve rising prosperity and a better quality of life with economic and employment opportunities for all".
Gordon Brown, before becoming the Prime Minister, was the Chancellor. According to The Times:
"The power to designate people as terror suspects and freeze their finances was introduced without parliamentary debate by Mr Brown when he was Chancellor. He has declared that the Treasury has become a “department for security”".
Isn't calling a department for security The Treasury rather like Hitler calling the gas chambers The Showers?
Like the courts, I would question whether the then Chancellor had the public power to act as he did. It used to be that a suspect was an innocent person and remained such until charged with a crime and found guilty by a court at which time sanctions would be imposed. There is something quite frightening about a government department which designates certain people as terror suspects, and refuses to inform them of the details of the allegations against them so that they can challenge the accusations, and yet freeze their finances and they have to justify what they have spent £10 on. Given that MPs do not have to provide receipts for the £25 they can claim each day on expenses, it is a bit rich demanding innocent people justify the expenditure of £10.
When we get more terrorised by the government than we do by the so-called terrorist suspects, its time to let that government know it will not be tolerated.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)