I have to say, I did not think that the injunction could withstand the blogger power which did not bow down to the pressure being applied to the mainstream media. The Guardian has got back some of its credibility as the guardian of free speech which has in the past wilted somewhat on exposing abuses of prisoners, and its not so Comment Is Free anymore. A combined effort by bloggers and the mainstream media finally opened the can of worms the government attempted to bury.
Why don't we go the whole hog? Anyone fancy a revolution? On second thoughts, I am sure that John Reid already has a law and plans to deal with two or more people getting together for a social occasion...
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
Site Meter
Showing posts with label justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label justice. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Even more common sense - judge attacks victim impact statements
The whole point of having a doctrine of Separation of Powers, is that it provides balances and checks between the Executive, Judiciary and Parliament, to prevent abuses of power. What we have seen happening under New Labour is the Executive encroaching into the territory of the Judiciary. Knee-jerkism from the Home Office as it responds to the headlines and editorials of The Sun. In its attempt to placate victims of crime, the Home Office and the Department for Constitutional Affairs have victimised offenders and prisoners.
It is the judge's role to judge what is the appropriate sentencing decision to make in any given case. It is not part of a judge's role to pander to the whims of politicians. As judge John Samuels points out, justice is about being dispassionate and not allowing emotions to cloud the issues. In my view, judges should rebel and refuse to allow victim statement's any right of audience in any court.
It is a shame that Harriet Harman has sold out her principles of integrity since she became part of New Labour's legal machinery. She used to be a staunch advocate of prisoners rights. It is true that power corrupts. Judge John Samuels should be praised for his correcting the scales of justice which the DCA has imbalanced with its grubby finger.
It is the judge's role to judge what is the appropriate sentencing decision to make in any given case. It is not part of a judge's role to pander to the whims of politicians. As judge John Samuels points out, justice is about being dispassionate and not allowing emotions to cloud the issues. In my view, judges should rebel and refuse to allow victim statement's any right of audience in any court.
It is a shame that Harriet Harman has sold out her principles of integrity since she became part of New Labour's legal machinery. She used to be a staunch advocate of prisoners rights. It is true that power corrupts. Judge John Samuels should be praised for his correcting the scales of justice which the DCA has imbalanced with its grubby finger.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)