There has been a leak claiming that the Guardian has got its facts wrong. It is not a leak from the Home Office if misinformation is supplied. It is understood that the Home Office adviser is a former ITN reporter. Moreover, it is understood that the leak originated from within the Met and that there is internal conflicts. There is a feeling of dissatisfaction firstly with the criticisms from the government over the police inquiry into the cash for honours, and secondly that the decision has already been made not to prosecute any of those involved. It is felt that the June announcement date is purely political timing and that the reason not to prosecute as being not in the public interest is described as a falsehood. Further leaks have come from both the Ministry of Defence and the opposition who had been briefed to a large extent.
One wonders why there has been a misleading of Parliament below unless it is pure window dressing?
Link.
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
No comments:
Post a Comment