Justice for Madeleine McCann
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
3 comments:
THE MCCANNS ADMITTED FROM DAY ONE THAT THEY HAD LEFT THE CHILDREN ALONE IN THE APARTMENT AND WERE CHECKING ON THEM EVERY 30 MINUTES.
FOR FOUR MONTHS, THE PJ HAD EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO CHARGE THEM WITH NEGLECT FROM DAY ONE, BUT MADE IT CLEAR THAT THEY WERE NOT GOING DOWN THAT ROUTE, BECAUSE ALL THE CHILDREN AND ALL THE PARENTS WERE ON MARK WARNER PREMISES AT THE TIME OF MADELEINE'S DISAPPEARANCE. THE MARK WARNER PROPERTY IS NOT EVEN PORTUGUESE TERRITORY. IT IS A BRITISH PURPOSE BUILT COMPANY RUN BY BRITISH RULES OF A BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSES OF CATERING FOR HOLIDAYMAKERS.
THE EX-COP WHO INTERVIEWED THE MCCANNS ILLEGALLY LEAKED SOME INCORRECT INFORMATION THAT THE MCCANNS WERE LIKELY TO FACE A CHARGE OF ACCIDENTAL HOMICIDE, WHICH FORCED THE MCCANNS TO EMPLOY SUCH HIGH POWERED LEGAL ADVISERS.
THE PJ HAVE NEVER CALLED THE MCCANNS BACK TO PORTUGAL. THEY WOULD HAVE TO RETURN UNDER THE LEGAL CONDITIONS THEY AGREED TO WHEN THEY LEFT PORTUGAL. THAT PROVISO STILL STANDS. STILL THE PJ HAVE NOT CALLED THEM BACK.
IF THE PORTUGUESE AUTHORITIES WANTED TO LAY CHARGES, THEY COULD HAVE DONE SO WHEN THEY VISITED LEICESTER COP SHOP TO QUESTION THE TAPAS GROUP. IT WAS OBVIOUS THAT THEY HAD NO INCLINATION TO DO SO, NOR HAD ANY EVIDENCE AGAINST THE MCCANNS.
'THE MARK WARNER PROPERTY IS NOT EVEN PORTUGUESE TERRITORY. '
.
John, I think we have a fifteen year old on your blog. She appears to have no knowledge of any of the matters arising.
Just delete (after some laughter, of course)
I didn't realize Clarence Mitchell was a fifteen year old - mind you it might be his mental age - to have believed everything the McCanns spun him!
Post a Comment