Site Meter

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Kate McCann: why didn’t they believe her?

Kate McCann: why didn’t they believe her?

Do you think it could have something to do with the lies that the McCanns told and that that is good enough reason not to believe her?

For example...

I hope Kate McCann is asked to explain why the McCanns put out the false story that the shutters had been jemmied and Apartment 5 A was the subject of a break-in?

This was the McCann theory fed to the British press. And they lapped it up. Break-in + abductor = abduction. The Mark Warner complex stated that there was no break-in. Then the police said that there was no evidence of a break-in. It was not until October, almost 6 months later, before Clarence Mitchell, the McCanns press spokesman admitted that there was no break-in.

The British media did not ask for an explanation why the McCanns fabricated the break-in story. Shouldn't the British media at least consider it was a cover up? Because without the break-in the abductor and abduction parts also tend to fall down.

And yet, Cassandra Jardine writes "the McCanns learnt after the abduction" as though it is a fact that Madeleine was abducted. But, the fact is that it was only ever the McCanns version of events and not the truth.

No comments: