The parents of missing toddler Madeleine McCann have returned to Portugal for the first time in over two years, their spokesman has confirmed.
The McCanns plan to hold a press conference later today.
Why are the Mainstream Media going to flock to hear what a child killer and her partner who disposed of Madeleine's body have got to say? It is unlikely that the McCanns are going to make a public confession. Rather, I suspect that they will be seeking to damage limitation The Truth of the Lies which exposesed them for what they are.
I don't suppose any of the MSM have got the guts to ask the McCanns "What child abduction?", and "Why did you lie about the fake break in?", and "Why did you think it was safe to leave 3 children under 4 years of age unsupervised whilst you went out binge drinking, when not a single authority supports your view that it was safe?".
32 comments:
Sick bucket please John....
IRONSIDE
Hi: Ironside. LOL.
Fucking hell - have you got ANY evidence for that sick claim?
The Sentinel: If you look through my archives you will find that I back up my claims. Furthermore,they are not sick. Rather, the McCanns conduct is sick from the start through to making money out of their crimes.
Point me in the direction of this evidence that you have then, but the police don't.
The Sentinel: Next time do your own research, I pointed you in the direction of my archive...
Clarence Mitchell calls the McCanns liars
The Madeleine Foundation has gone from the net John...Not sure if they have problems apart from the Mccanns that is...Also MF said that Amaral was due in England to meet with them and do a speech. My thoughts, Mccanns are there to stop Amaral going to England..The Press would have to report this and what he says..
IRONSIDE
Seeing as you are the one making these claims friend, I think it is more then reasonable to ask you what evidence you have that the McCanns murdered their daughter, disposed of the body and then covered it up.
And now having looked at your "archive" I can see that, of course, you have absolutely no evidence whatsoever - not a single scrap - that the McCanns murdered their daughter, disposed of the body and then covered it up; all you have is flimsy circumstantial evidence, gossip in the main, that is then grossly extrapolated into wild speculations.
That is not evidence at all.
As for the McCanns "making money" - that has largely been spent on schemes to help find their daughter, something I would do, and I think most ordinary normal people would do if in their position.
Aside from the fact that you have absolutely no evidence to black up your sick claims - do you really think it is possible for this pair to not only carry as a married couple getting about their life but also to continue to act as the concerned parents still campaigning for to find their daughter if they were really guilty?
Do you not think overwhelming remorse and guilt would tear them apart?
You're the one suggesting it was murder. I only claim that Madeleine was killed. Had it been purely accidental, there was no reason not to report her death to the relevant authorities. So cause of death is an issue the McCanns wished to cover up. Therefore Madeleine had to disappear. To explain this they came up with the abductor theory. And went to the extent of setting up a fake break in story. They have yet to explain why they lied about the fake break in.
As they already know where Madeleine is, there is no need for a search for her. The Findmadeleine fund is a money making scam.
Until they explain why they felt the need to invent a fake break into Apartment 5A, the onus is upon them.
All they care about is trying to protect their reputation. But it is in tatters. Opinion polls regularly fin that over 70% believe that they are responsible for Madeleine's disappearance.
Clearly you are claiming foul play - that is quite clear to anyone; and like I said you have no evidence for it at all, not a single scarp.
As for the opinion polls - is that they way you think you should have been tried? By an opinion poll?
But you still haven't answered the question:
Aside from the fact that you have absolutely no evidence to black up your sick claims - do you really think it is possible for this pair to not only carry as a married couple getting about their life but also to continue to act as the concerned parents still campaigning for to find their daughter if they were really guilty?
Do you not think overwhelming remorse and guilt would tear them apart?
They may regret being involved in her death and disposal of her body, but if they had remorse they would admit what they have done. The rest is just an act.
Is that a fact?
Because I thought your theory was that "remorse is a middle-class thing" and you couldnt get much more middle class then the McCanns, now could you?
You have no evidence at all for your twisted speculations and as someone who thinks that convicted criminals should have so many more rights you really should realise the gross hypocrisy of your suggestion that two people who have never even been charged with any offence could be found guilt by poxy opinion polls; surely they have that most fundamental right - the presumption of innocence until proven guilty?
If you really feel so strongly about it and think you have the evidence to prove that guilt then why don't you take out a private prosecution?
They can't show remorse even though they are middle class simply because they are maintaining their innocence.
A private prosecution would be a good idea.
However, it is doubtful that the CPS would authorise this because it appears as though the government has an interest in the McCanns not being prosecuted.
John I think you have been troll-oped...lol...
IRONSIDE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix6bKUnmOCM
Mccann always denied they used sedatives...What happened to make him change it and now think that the "abductor" may have used a substance...
Could it be because their friend Fiona found it odd that his dear wife kept placing her hand in front of the twins noses to check they were breathing. Even Fiona found it odd ...DVD Police Files...
IRONSIDE
Ironside: I thought so too. Fancy guarding childkillers...
'anonymous'
Is all dissent or questioning of a blogger, trolling then? Especially when that blogger makes bold statements and very contentious accusations against people who have a lost their daughter? Blog comments are only fine if they affirm the opinion of the blogger? Is that it?
And unlike you, at least I use an online identity; personally I think you are trolling - as is usually the case with the accuser - as you haven't made any on topic comment or added anything to the debate.
Jailhouselawyer,
Do you not agree that the most fundamental right is the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty?
And like I said, if you feel so strongly about the McCanns guilt that you are able to publicly denounce them and you feel you are able to do so because you have compelling evidence beyond reasonable doubt, then why you haven't you at least tried to bring a private prosecution?
And what possible governemt conspiracy could be at play to stop one?
The McCanns chose trial by media.
The jury can make what they will about the defendents right to remain silent.
Tell me why they lied about the break in?
Sentinel, you will give yourself a heart attack in a moment. It is obvious you are a family member. Only family would be so protective. The Mccanns are guilty you know it and I know it...No reason to lie if you are innocent...The Mccanns have told so many lies that they cannot think straight. They are also thieves who have robbed from children and the elderly. Mccann this evening is in his glory hogging the limelight. Madeleine and the twins did not matter on the 3rd May and matter even less today. This trip we will find out in a few days will have been about Amaral and his book. Nothing to do with madeleine , the Mccanns are selfish and will remain so until the day they die. Kate is haggard and very worried as would I be if I were in her shoes, she looks nearer 50..Guilt has a habit of doing that to people. As for her dear husband he could give a damn, just keep running Mccann.
IRONSIDE
anonymous,
As I thought - you are a troll, a nut and a conspiracy theory nut at that.
I love how you think you "know" what I "know" as well, whilst all the time you don't have a single scrap of evidence that would stand up in court - just unsubstantiated rumours and malicious gossip.
Jailhouselawyer,
You really don't like giving direct answers to direct question do you?
Do you not agree that the most fundamental right is the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty?
No one chooses "trial by media" in all reality now do they? Especially not a couple who have just lost their daughter - but it does sell papers doesn't it? And guess what business the media are in?
You say they lied about a break in - prove that they lied about a break in, in fact go one better and answer the other two questions:
If you feel so strongly about the McCanns guilt that you are able to publicly denounce them and you feel you are able to do so because you have compelling evidence beyond reasonable doubt, then why you haven't you at least tried to bring a private prosecution?
And what possible government conspiracy could be at play to stop one?
I have already provided you with the link where their spokesman admitted that there was no break in. The McCanns had claimed that there was a break in. Therefore, the McCanns lied. Why did they lie? Obvious, in an attempt to cover up. But, some people are not fooled as easily as you.
Hold the front page - people fly to Portugal, hold press conference, say sweet FA and fly back again. Does their lawyer not have a 'phone?
V.
He didn't "admit there was no break in" - he said there was "There was no evidence of a break-in" and if this was a professional job nor would there be. Its just tittle tattle - no more, no less. Certainly not evidence that the McCanns murdered their daughter and disposed of the body as you claim.
But once again you avoid giving straight answers to three straight questions:
Do you not agree that the most fundamental right is the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty?
If you feel so strongly about the McCanns guilt that you are able to publicly denounce them and you feel you are able to do so because you have compelling evidence beyond reasonable doubt, then why you haven't you at least tried to bring a private prosecution?
And what possible government conspiracy could be at play to stop one?
Ironside:
Madeleine
I see - no answers then. You are full of shit, fella.
You and all of your 'rights for criminals' posturing - you are a hypocrite of the grossest dimensions: Rights only for those you deem worthy of rights, even without due process.
The chip on your shoulder is as big as your stain on society.
Why is it that the Mccann supporters always when losing an argument resort to abuse. Just like Mccann ,ignorant ,uneducate and full of arrogance. Why change the subject Sentinel. It is very obvious his dear Kate has mental health issues and should never have become a mother. I wonder how many drinks it took for kate to make her "press release".
IRONSIDE
Sentinel, I'm with you one hundred percent. These people are malicious and thoughtless.
Mr. Hirst, while you were incarcerated you may have got the impression that you were clever. In the real world you don't cut the mustard. You are a nasty, useless excuse for a person.
I would not normally criticise an indivdual, but you ask for it. Grow a brain and get some compassion. Stop believing that everyone is as bad as you. Believe me you are a one-off evil bastard.
Keep at them John.
I see the "Paid PR" have paid a vist.
I am not happy about child killers dictating terms, at least until they have faced justice and paid for their crimes and become rehabilitated. At present they are fleeing from justice and should be on the FBI's most wanted list of fugitives!
So again - no answers to the simple straight questions; the reason being is that you know to answer them honestly will reveal you are full of shit either ways.
These people are not "child killers" - they have not even been charged with any offence. They are innocent until proven guilty and you have don't have a single scrap of evidence for your hateful contentions.
I love how you - of all people - think you get to look down any sort of killers in any case; you committed a completely nefarious crime without reason on a totally innocent woman and took all of her rights away permanently - yet you bleat on about how "society owes you"!
You got off very lightly fella, if it had been a relative of mine I would have been waiting for you by the gates.
The fact that they have not been "charged" is because they did a very good job of covering up the crime scene.Do you not want a grave for this little girl? a place where she can rest in peace. A stone with her name on it...Or is that what the Mccanns mean by No Stone Unturned.I have no idea how you can live with yourselves, she was 3 years old , an innocent what did she do that was so wrong. Disrupt the Mccanns evening' if they wanted a holiday free from children they should have left them with a family member. If they had, madeleine would be here today going to school with her siblings and playing in the sunshine...
The Mccanns can still see no wrong in leaving small children, they have never once said to the public "please never ever do what we did"...Why not? Because they are arrogant and still think it is OK...
By the way there was not enough evidence to charge the Mccanns...official report..not that there was No Evidence..
Does laying into John ease your guilt?
Post a Comment