A British soldier on patrol in a poppy field in Helmand province in Afghanistan.
If World War 2 was the war to end all wars, why are we still at war in Afghanistan, Iraq and about to go to war in Iran?
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
8 comments:
It's been explained over and over - the cabals need war. We're heading for one now.
it just so happens that the places you list host islamo-terror nutsacks. I'd rather fight them there than here.
Kris: Isn't there an argument because we are fighting them over there that they seek revenge over here?
because where would the arms sellers make money from if there was worldwide peace...
Don't forget the bankers support both sides and profit from both sides of a war.
Sir James Badger is correct and Lord Jay in the article is not being listened to...
Its not rocket science if you'll pardon the pun
JL
I'd say it's got more to do with, in Iran, I'madinnerjacket and his vow to "wipe Israel off the map" and his nuke programme which, in the in absence of any reasonable explanation, I can only conclude he means what he says.
In Afhganistan, taliban fighters wont let go. Iraq is like a magnet for exploding jihadis from all over the world to fight the infidel.
So no, it's not about revenge- at least not on our part.
Kris: Quite possibly so. No, the revenge is theirs for the incursion into their territory for the natural resource oil.
Errrrr I think you will find that 'the war to end all wars' was the first world war.
and from there all fallacy flows.
Our squaddies should be helping the cops look in rucksacks at all the tubestations not messing about with something that will never be won in Afghanistan.
If we really have 4,000 terrorist nutters waiting to do their biz then the sooner the troops are home the better!
Post a Comment