Site Meter

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Graeme Archer's arrow misses the target by at least a mile

Graeme Archer's arrow misses the target by at least a mile

This toffee-nosed Tory twat cannot even spell his own name correctly. At least the disgraced Geoffery Archer can, even if I can't. Apparently, he also suffers from acne. It's a part of London, and as you know, those from darn sarf drop their aitches and don't know how to speak proper. The idiot even spells East London with a small east. It's a point of the compass, numpty, and a place name like East Yorkshire, therefore it requires a capital E. He states:

"Jacqui Smith MP annoyed me this week, with her casual denunciation of Hackney as a place where no Home Secretary would dare tread after dark, no matter how desirous she may be of her nocturnal appointment with a kebab (nutritional sustenance, apparently, for those of you reading in the Home Counties, and not, as I had feared, something disreputable to do with premiership footballers).

Any problems that Hackney has can be connected in a straight line with the maladministration of Labour at a local and a national level. If you’re so concerned about our safety, Ms Smith, stop releasing violent prisoners early and stop demanding bail for thugs".

When I heard that Jacqui Smith had made this remark, I thought, 'wait for it, therefore we need to bring in more repressive and oppressive legislation to increase freedoms by removing more liberties'. She was not referring to Home Secretaries you dimwit! She was speaking as a woman. Home Secretaries are bodyguarded up to fuck. Although I did laugh when Douglas Hurd scurried away like a scared rabbit during the Bristol riot when bricks and petrol bombs were lobbed his way.

The whole concept of public protection is bollocks. It is based upon incapacitation theory. Part of this states that we lock people up now and/or keep them in jail for longer on the basis that they might commit a crime in the future. Where is your evidence that violent prisoners are being released early? As I understand it, prisoners are released on time. And, where do you get this notion that they are violent prisoners? Any prisoners caught being violent are kept in longer. Those convicted of violent crimes are often model prisoners inside. As for bail, those deemed to pose too high a risk are refused bail. Rarely, the system gets it wrong. And when they do the tabloid media scream like a demented child, and feed those who buy such trash with media hype.

Conservativehome by publishing such crap means that it has sunk to the gutter level of that pseudo-blogger Guido who has often been equated as the blogosphere's equivalent of The Sun.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think that, before launching straight into ad hominem attacks like "toffy-nosed Tory twat who can't even spell his name correctly" (which is, incidentally, far from the case), it might make you look less foolish if you spell "toffee-nosed" correctly.

Barnacle Bill said...

Much like NuLabor use our Armed Forces as a political football, the whole prisons/prisoners/penal reform is also becoming more political.
If we could take the politics out of how the government deals with this whole area, we might be on the road to proper penal reform.

jailhouselawyer said...

a pedant: My minor error is corrected. Do you think you could ask Mr Archer to correct every thing wrong with his piece?