BRITAIN’S first Muslim peer Lord Ahmed faces a jail sentence after texting on his mobile phone moments before crashing into a car and killing the driver.
This case stinks to high heaven.
Lord Ahmed of Rotherham, 51, was told that although he was blameless over the accident, he was still guilty of “prolonged dangerous driving”.
Blameless? He was driving in the outside lane on the motorway and texting immediately prior to the crash in which he caused the death of another driver. Firstly, he should not have been texting but instead have his eyes on the road ahead. Secondly, he should not have been in the outside lane hogging it as there were two other lanes free of traffic. He could have avoided the crash either by not texting, being in one of the other two lanes or looking where he was going and breaking in time.
The cheeky bastard! "Lord Ahmed had hoped for just a fine after admitting dangerous driving at an earlier hearing".
WTF! Has this got to do with anything? "The court heard he was so involved in denouncing terror, a “fatwa” death sentence had been issued against him by Muslim radicals". He gave the other driver a death sentence by his causing death by dangerous driving. The law works in mysterious ways. Lord Ahmed was not charged with the appropriate charge. Rather, he was only charged with dangerous driving. Perhaps, the other driver committed suicide? Still, assisting suicide is a criminal offence...
Related content...
Text-death driver has appeal rejected
A LORRY driver who killed a man after crashing into the back of his tractor while keying explicit text messages into his phone has failed to convince top judges his six-year jail term was too harsh.
One of the judges in the above case is none other than Mr Justice Tugendhat, who has recently ordered Guido not to mention the Court Order gagging him which was obtained by those dodgy solicitors Carter Fuck.
4 comments:
Guido (Paul Staines) admits that he was emailing while driving. Hopefully, this time he wasn't also drunk and the car was insured.
If Guy Fawkes has descendants or an estate, they should sue Staines for defamation of character.
Enjoyed the posts on the Galley/Green arrests. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a charge to answer.
Galley is certainly guilty of Misconduct in Public Office under a general interpretation:
a) Public officer.
b) Wilfully misconducted himself.
c) Abused the public's trust. (Stole confidential information.)
d) No excuse or justification. (He admitted he was entirely politically motivated, and did not act out of conscience.)
As an aside, in 2 years, he failed to expose any Government deceit or deception.
Prior to 1989, the Official Secrets Act made leaking any Government confidential information illegal. Then, the Act was changed and only leaking security information was illegal. Details here. Unless an exception can be made because the information was leaked serially over 2 years.
Of course, the Police are still entitled to arrest and question Galley and Green. They need to determine what else they've had their grubby hands on. Note that it was counter-terrorist Police.
With respect to Quick's complaint:
"The Tory machinery and their press friends are mobilised against this investigation in a wholly corrupt way" is legitimate comment. It's the apology that rings false. No doubt the Tories reached out to Quick's superiors.
Whit??????
IS EVERY FOKKER DRUNK WHO IS READING THIS????
Read the original post, please. Bent government prosecutor, bent everything. If this was you or I that had committed such an offence, we would have been put down like the other poor mortals who have who have been featured on this blog.
Post a Comment