Site Meter

Tuesday, January 04, 2011

Hirst v UK (No2) and the Treaty of London (1949)

Hirst v UK (No2) and the Treaty of London (1949)

STATUTE OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE (Treaty of London 1949)

Article 3

Every member of the Council of Europe must accept the principles of the rule of law and of the enjoyment by all persons within its jurisdiction of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and collaborate sincerely and effectively in the realisation of the aim of the Council as specified in Chapter I.

Article 4

Any European State which is deemed to be able and willing to fulfil the provisions of Article 3 may be invited to become a member of the Council of Europe by the Committee of Ministers. Any State so invited shall become a member on the deposit on its behalf with the Secretary General of an instrument of accession to the present Statute.

Article 7

Any member of the Council of Europe may withdraw by formally notifying the Secretary General of its intention to do so. Such withdrawal shall take effect at the end of the financial year in which it is notified, if the notification is given during the first nine months of that financial year. If the notification is given in the last three months of the financial year, it shall take effect at the end of the next financial year.

Article 8

Any member of the Council of Europe which has seriously violated Article 3 may be suspended from its rights of representation and requested by the Committee of Ministers to withdraw under Article 7. If such member does not comply with this request, the Committee may decide that it has ceased to be a member of the Council as from such date as the Committee may determine.

Comment: Quite clearly in relation to Hirst v UK (No2) the UK has seriously breached Article 3, therefore, either the UK should withdraw from the Council of Europe, or failing that, then the Council of Europe must expel the UK from the Council of Europe under Article 8.

1 comment:

James Higham said...

Bit of an ask, taking on the UK by yourself, John.