Dear My Telegraph blog...
I think I have found the missing link. You cannot censor this, it's already out there in cyberspace, on t'internet.
This is G o o g l e's cache of http://my.telegraph.co.uk/jailhouselawyer/may_2008/mccanns_lose_public_vote_of_no_confidence.htm as retrieved on 19 May 2008 20:06:14 GMT.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:GeQGjEasdvcJ:my.telegraph.co.uk/jailhouselawyer/may_2008/mccanns_lose_public_vote_of_no_confidence.htm+mccanns+social+services&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=65&gl=uk&client=firefox-a
Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted: mccanns social services
Where am I?
* telegraph.co.uk
* My Telegraph
* jailhouselawyer
Log in
Telegraph Logo Winner, Best Consumer Online Publisher, AOP Awards
* Home
* Posts
* Comments
* People
* Tags
* Announcements
* Help
jailhouselawyer's avatar
jailhouselawyer
Hull, England
Insideout
jailhouselawyer writes about:
* 999 caller being sued
* Absolute right not to be tortured
* Afghanistan
* ambulance worker's own negligence led to blaming octogenarian for his own mishap
* Armed forces
* army
* BAE Systems
* BBC
* BBC 1 Look North
* BBC fails to provide balance
* Bush and Blair secret Iraq memo
* CIA
* civvie street
* Clarence Mitchell
* comedy of terrors
* Compensation
* Compensation culture gone mad
* Current affairs
* Learco Chindamo
* Prince Harry
* View all
jailhouselawyer's blog posts
Comments that jailhouselawyer has left on other readers' blogs
Blog posts that jailhouselawyer has saved, shown in date order
< Back to all blog posts
McCanns lose public vote of no confidence
Posted by jailhouselawyer at 20:18 on 19 May 2008
The McCannsfiles website is reporting that the McCanns are suing the former director and a journalist of the extinct weekly Portuguese newspaper "Tal&Qual" (T&Q) for defamation. "Kate and Gerry McCann believe that the publication of the headline "PJ believes that the parents killed Maddie" put public opinion, world-wide, against them".
However, the Tal&Qual article appeared on 24 August 2007 and 15 days later the PJ made both the McCanns suspects in the disappearance of Madeleine. The report in T&Q was in quotes and referred to what the PJ believed as opposed to what the journalist and director believed. In my view, providing that the story is reliably sourced, then there is no defamation of the McCanns character.
Furthermore, Associated Press reported this story on 18 May 2007 and at the same time this poll was conducted under the heading related content. As you can see from the result below, 3 months before the T&Q story was published, public opinion worldwide was already against the McCanns. Therefore, the T&Q story cannot be responsible for turning public opinion against the McCanns.
Live Vote
Is it acceptable that Madeleine McCann and her siblings were left alone? * 7437 responses
No, no matter how safe her parents assumed the community to be, three children that young should not be left unattended.
92%
Yes, her parents say they checked in on the kids every half hour. Critics may be coming from a different cultural perspective on child rearing.
8%
I would say that it was the McCanns own conduct of child neglect which turned public opinion worldwide against them. Perhaps, it is time that the McCanns had a reality check? Freedom of speech is too strong to disappear just like Madeleine. We will not be silenced just because we do not agree with the version of events as described by the McCanns. The available evidence does not support the McCanns, and neither does the majority of public opinion.
Clarence Mitchell is paid to sell the McCanns story. We choose not to buy it.
UPDATE: It may well be that T&Q is not the real target. It could be a McCann tactic to discover who in the PJ leaked the information to T&Q.
http://prisonersvoice.blogspot.com/2008/05/mccanns-lose-public-vote-of-no.html
* Post to:
* del.icio.us
* Digg
* Newsvine
* NowPublic
* Reddit
Current affairs, McCanns, public opinion, Clarence Mitchell, defamation of character, TalandQual
* Comments [4]
* Back to top
* Report this post
4 comments
Show most recent: First Last
Dogblog's avatar
Jailhouse Lawyer..........
Dogblog 19 May 2008 20:29
Hello again, we have not exchanged comments for some time now.
I have posted before on here that the biggest mistake the McCanns made(in my opinion) was to give the disappearance of their daughter such a high profile.
The publicity meant that everyone would know what Maddie looked like, almost as though she was a child of their own.
This would have made it impossible for the abductor to let her be seen in public,and would have made it even more possible that she had become such a liabilty that the abductor would have to dispose of her.
They became her worst enemies,although motivated with the best intentions.
They are parents of above average intelligence and yet the couldn't work out that simple fact for themselves.
Report this comment
Mad Mac's avatar
Two mistakes
Mad Mac 19 May 2008 20:37
The first was leaving a child of such tender years unattended in a strange room with no responsible person in charge.
The second was the publicity given to the unusual mark on Madeline's eye. This should have been kept from the press and the public but circulated, confidentially, to all hospital's and schools in Europe, asking them to keep this secret but to notify the Police should a child with this mark come to their attention.
Report this comment
irish_eyes77's avatar
I can't help but feel
irish_eyes77 19 May 2008 20:53
the McCann's have been painted as victims by the press (in the UK) because they're middle class with good careers. If (God forbid) they came from a council estate they wouldn't have been looked upon so favourably. I imagine the headlines would read "council estate parents lose child" - causing huge outrage; and a full enquiry from social services would ensue.
I digress, a child should NEVER be left unattended, no matter who the parent; as the McCann's discovered, much to the chagrin.
As above, I agree that she's too well known by the public now, from photos and constant media attention; making her a liablity for any abductor.
I feel sorry for their loss; but equally furious at their sheer negligence.
Report this comment
patrickM's avatar
I
patrickM 19 May 2008 21:02
still think the world is being hypocritical when they criticize these parents for doing anything they can to find their child. I would turn the world upside down
Report this comment
Comment on this post
You must be logged on to leave a comment.
Join my.telegraph.co.uk
Join the debate with the Telegraph's reader community:
* Read blogs from other Telegraph readers
* Write your own blog
* Share your opinions with the rest of the community
* Save all your comments in one place
Joining is free and only takes a few moments
Sign up now | Log in
Blog Archive
* May 2008
* March 2008
* February 2008
* October 2007
* August 2007
* May 2007
ABOUT ME
Let's just say that I am the type of person who gets peeved when I am asked to describe myself and then I am told that my description contains inappropriate words!
What is my.Telegraph.co.uk?
Read, write and share your opinions with other Telegraph readers. Click here to find out more.
Search My Telegraph
Page tools
* Email this page
* Print this page
Blog options
* Subscribe
You are here:
Where am I?
* telegraph.co.uk
* My Telegraph
* jailhouselawyer
* About us
* Contact us
* Forgotten your password?
* Advertising
* Press office
* Terms and Conditions
* Privacy and cookie policy
* Credits
Powered by irPublish™ v5.2.5035.1112 and irBlog™ v1.5.2302.0.
No comments:
Post a Comment