McCanns "accept" returning to Portugal
I have difficulty with this story.
Basically, the McCanns are claiming, through their spokesman Clarence Mitchell, that they are willing to personally attend a reconstruction in Portugal, but because their friends are less than keen to assist the reconstruction, therefore the McCanns say the reconstruction is unlikely to occur.
This blaming of their friends appears to me to be a smokescreen. The McCanns appear to be hiding behind them. In my view, this is precisely what the McCanns did on 3 May 2007. They hid behind their friends.
Then we have Clarence Mitchell's pathetic lies. He is claiming that Kate McCann saw the abductor kidnapping Madeleine before her very eyes and the McCann team are worried about Kate McCann's mental state. And yet, the McCanns have always said that they regret not being there the minute Madeleine was taken. And, I think that the PJ are also concerned about the mental state of Kate McCann's mind during 3 May 2007.
Another issue here is the findmadeleinefund.
"Fund Objectives as stated by the Madeline's Fund Board of Directors
1.1 The full objects of the Fund are:
1.1.1 To secure the safe return to her family of Madeleine McCann who was abducted in Praia da Luz, Portugal on Thursday 3rd May 2007;
1.1.2 To procure that Madeleine’s abduction is thoroughly investigated and that her abductors, as well as those who played or play any part in assisting them, are identified and brought to justice; and
1.1.3 To provide support, including financial assistance, to Madeleine’s family.
1.2 If the above objects are fulfilled then the objects of the Foundation shall be to pursue such purposes in similar cases arising in the United Kingdom, Portugal or elsewhere".
Given that there is no evidence that Madeleine was abducted, it is strange to set up a fund with the purpose of returning a girl who may not have been abducted at all. And this strange reasoning continues with the second purpose of the fund. To investigate what may not have occurred. It would seem to me that only the third purpose makes any sense, it is designed to line the pockets of the McCanns. And, if there is any small change left over, they might give some of it to a worthy cause.
A mixture of law, politics, autobiography and humour. Once described as "The Devilish Advocate" (Guardian), I do have the ability to provoke a response. Sometimes it comes from someone who uses a thought process, and sometimes from jerks usually associated with the knee.
7 comments:
JAILHOUSE,
A DEAD PERSON HAS NO HUMAN RIGHTS.
WHERE ARE YOUR LEAFLETS VILIFYING THE MOTHER OF MARI LUZ, WHO ALLOWED HER DAUGHTER TO CROSS THE PATH OF AN OFFENDER LIKE YOURSELF.
WHERE ARE YOUR LEAFLETS VILIFYING THE MOTHER OF BABY GRACE? JAILHOUSE, YOU AND YOUR EVIL GANG AT THE3ARGUIDOS ARE FAR MORE DANGEROUS THAN THE LIKES OF BABY GRACE'S PARENTS. AT LEAST THEY ARE SHOWING SOME REMORSE WHILST AWAITING THE DEATH PENALTY. YOU AND YOUR FELLOW PERVERTS AT THE3ARGUIDOS SHOW SCANT REGARD FOR ANY HUMAN
I DON'T BELIEVE THIS BLOG IS EVEN WRITTEN BY THE REAL JAILHOUSE. IT IS PROBABLY THE PROPERTY OF A PROLIFIC BLOGGER WHO SEEMS TO HAVE SO MUCH TIME ON HIS HANDS THAT HE IS ABLE TO MANAGE HUNDREDS OF BLOGS AT ONE TIME --ALL POINTING TO A LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY STUDENT.
Jailhouse,
You have done the crime and done the time. You claim to be a reformed character by sticking up for human rights for offenders, cf. your successful stance on voting rights for prisoners. No doubt that is the tip of the iceberg of what you have achieved for prisoners.
But surely, the first rule of ANY offender's human rights is that he is presumed to be innocent until judged before a court of law, not by mob rule or by the press or by blogrollers.
Surely, you would not have wanted people baying for your blood for a whole year whilst awaiting trial? Perhaps nobody had any emotional involvement in your case, so nobody was baying for your blood at any time. But continue with your harassment by blog and let it spill into real life and real people, then you run a very damaging risk to your liberty.
PS. What's the news on your ASBO these days?
You might want to advise your pervert friends at 3A, who cannot stop themselves from obsessing about other people's children and stealing online pictures of other people's children:
http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/localenv/litter/law/lawlit.htm
People who carelessly discard litter in any open place are committing a criminal offence. However, a person convicted of this offence could be liable to a maximum fine of £2,500.
LITTER LAW, DROPPING LITTER IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE
JANZ (the3arguidos) says:
This forum does not endorse the leaflet. We have simply agreed to have the3A link printed on it.
3Arguidos make it quite clear to the authors of the leaflet that we neither condone nor condemn what they are trying to achieve. It is NOT a forum leaflet.
Is it likely that a person who finds a tri-folded, scruffy leaflet will bother to pick it up off the ground, unfold it and read it? If they get that far, they may look at the printed links in order to see where the leaflet originates. See the Litter Laws above.
That law ALWAYS applies to the originator of the flyer.
People only need to google to discover the many critiques of the 3A who have correctly assessed that it is a hate forum for self-centred psychotic, lonely people with nothing better to do than make attention seeking posts about their lonely, self-induced problems about their horrid little lives.
It's no use saying Bill Stickers is innocent, because he ALWAYS gets prosecuted
Well, well Jailhouselawyer, you seem to have become the aim for the McFilth hatred.
Don’t worry, you have too many besides you.
Love, Luz
Post a Comment