Far from threatening national sovereignty, research shows the ECHR is a catalyst speeding up existing movements for change
Is the European court of human rights (ECHR) a dangerous monster, constantly eyeing an endangered prey called national sovereignty? Or is it rather a beloved, benign and not particularly powerful protector of human rights? Anyone following the debates in the press and in parliament in the United Kingdom and in other European countries may get the impression that the court in Strasbourg is increasingly under attack.
Disputes over voting rights for prisoners, crucifixes in classrooms and abortion rights have all made the headlines recently. Is there reason for concern that the European court is nibbling away at the power of states to decide over their own future?
2 comments:
Far from threatening national sovereignty, research shows the ECHR is a catalyst speeding up existing movements for change
The other one's got bells on it, John.
James: I think it is a fair and accurate article. We're obviously on opposite sides of the English Channel.
Post a Comment